Active Users:621 Time:24/11/2024 09:02:12 PM
Why are so many male action heroes John or Jack? For women it's a feminine, tough & generic name Cannoli Send a noteboard - 28/01/2012 12:19:38 PM
John/Jack and Kate are just very common names for characters. Kate in particular seems to be a favorite action heroine name, probably because it is widespread and not particularly in or out of fashion as to make the character seem dated, but at the same time is not overtly feminine. It's also short for a more feminine name (Katherine or one of its many variations, including more trendy/modern ones like Caitlyn or old-fashioned ones like Kathleen), and with its predominantly hard sounds, can pass as the kind of nickname a tough, tomboy who grows up to be a detective would go by (and her grizzled but doting father can always call her "Katie" to show that she's a daddy's girl). "Mary" or "Ann" or "Jane" are more generic, but also more classicly feminine and associated with more typical female roles. Kate is one of those names that makes it clear she's a girl, but can still be tough or hang with the boys.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
fictional detectives whose first name (if sometimes shortened) is Kate. Why so many? - 28/01/2012 03:19:52 AM 919 Views
You know, I'd never even noticed that - 28/01/2012 08:47:21 AM 820 Views
1-syllable names are easy? - 28/01/2012 09:55:50 AM 722 Views
No idea. - 28/01/2012 10:41:15 AM 653 Views
Why are so many male action heroes John or Jack? For women it's a feminine, tough & generic name - 28/01/2012 12:19:38 PM 670 Views
Monosyllabic names sound tougher. And the pink half of the baby-naming book is short on those. - 28/01/2012 12:27:40 PM 652 Views
Hurray for linguistics! *NM* - 02/02/2012 08:07:50 PM 379 Views
Magic Strikes series by Ilona Andrews - Kate Daniels - 02/02/2012 07:15:40 PM 736 Views
Re: I've read that! Forgot to add her. She's really good. *NM* - 04/02/2012 05:02:50 AM 303 Views

Reply to Message