I just find myself wondering if the downside of the necessary protection of conglomerates and corporations like Disney, Warner Bros., Fox, etc. is that many works will never receive that posthumous "second wave" of popularity that comes from those "classics" editions that are so often associated with public domain works. Times have changed. I do support some limited expiration of copyright due to the factor I note above, but at the same time I'm realistic and note that there's no way in this world that Disney's copyrights could ever lapse without a huge amount of turmoil and confusion. I just wonder if there may be a middle ground somewhere where a lifetime+70/95 after initial publication may be applicable in single-creator works and something more indefinite when multiple rights/signed-away rights are concerned.
As someone who has two copyrighted works that won't expire until at least the last quarter of the 21st century (and hopefully into the 22nd), it would be nice if by some miracle my translations made enough royalties to provide some income for myself and any relatives...but I think it'd be odd if it were to go to the fourth or fifth generation born after my death.
As someone who has two copyrighted works that won't expire until at least the last quarter of the 21st century (and hopefully into the 22nd), it would be nice if by some miracle my translations made enough royalties to provide some income for myself and any relatives...but I think it'd be odd if it were to go to the fourth or fifth generation born after my death.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.

Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D.
03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM
- 1868 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public.
04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM
- 998 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works?
04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM
- 926 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc.
04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM
- 904 Views
That's not the point, though.
05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM
- 980 Views
????
05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM
- 946 Views
Re: ????
05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM
- 983 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work
05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM
- 950 Views
I don't get it.
04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM
- 1212 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain.
04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM
- 1013 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright.
04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
- 997 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM*
04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM
- 525 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others.
04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM
- 934 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM*
05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM
- 428 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen.
04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM
- 1032 Views
Answering you specifically
05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM
- 946 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway)
04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM
- 981 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM
- 891 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM
- 916 Views
That is a very confusing article.
04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
- 1039 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different
04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM
- 969 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies?
05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM
- 920 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM*
05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM
- 413 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics...
05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM
- 1084 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM*
06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM
- 454 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument?
06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM
- 925 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM*
06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM
- 497 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better.
06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM
- 975 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM
- 1071 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM
- 976 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you
06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM
- 999 Views
Can you back that up?
06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM
- 1097 Views
Re: Can you back that up?
06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM
- 883 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living.
06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM
- 1183 Views