In all seriousness, I think that should be something that ought to be changed as a compromise of sorts. Otherwise, works by dead 4x great-grandfathers still being part of copyright and possibly estate lawsuits (which are more frequent than some realize) would be the case. Not quite what the original copyright laws of the 19th century had in mind when they aimed to protect the living authors and not those who would be born after his grandchildren had died off. I think 70 years after author death is a good range, but I will also admit that corporations should have different protections since that is the heart and soul of their existence.
I don't think corporations should have more rights than people. It's one thing to claim they're people and get people's rights but what winds up happening is they get substantially preferential treatment, which is ridiculous and harmful. That would certainly stifle creativity.
This message last edited by Vivien on 06/01/2012 at 12:55:57 AM
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D.
03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM
- 1940 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public.
04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM
- 1055 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works?
04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM
- 1002 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc.
04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM
- 960 Views
That's not the point, though.
05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM
- 1045 Views
????
05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM
- 1002 Views
Re: ????
05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM
- 1046 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work
05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM
- 1008 Views
I don't get it.
04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM
- 1295 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain.
04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM
- 1093 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright.
04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
- 1055 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM*
04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM
- 577 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others.
04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM
- 988 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM*
05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM
- 456 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen.
04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM
- 1086 Views
Answering you specifically
05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM
- 1001 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway)
04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM
- 1042 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM
- 945 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM
- 969 Views
That is a very confusing article.
04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
- 1127 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different
04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM
- 1055 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies?
05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM
- 983 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM*
05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM
- 441 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics...
05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM
- 1136 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM*
06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM
- 477 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument?
06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM
- 978 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM*
06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM
- 526 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better.
06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM
- 1028 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM
- 1156 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal?
06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM
- 1026 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM
- 1036 Views
Can you back that up?
06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM
- 1159 Views
Re: Can you back that up?
06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM
- 935 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living.
06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM
- 1246 Views