Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies?
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM
They are still very valuable and they still sell very well. Hell I bought some of them on VHS and then turned around and bought them again on DVD. Why should anyone else ever be allowed to print and sell Disney movies without paying Disney for the right? I think as long as the original copy right holder is publishing the material they should maintain right to the material. Even if it is Disney.
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D.
- 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM
1903 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public.
- 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM
1029 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works?
- 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM
958 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc.
- 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM
931 Views
That's not the point, though.
- 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM
1014 Views
????
- 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM
976 Views
Re: ????
- 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM
1020 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work
- 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM
986 Views
I don't get it.
- 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM
1246 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain.
- 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM
1047 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright.
- 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
1028 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM*
- 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM
543 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others.
- 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM
964 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM*
- 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM
441 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen.
- 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM
1061 Views
Answering you specifically
- 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM
978 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway)
- 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM
1011 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
- 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM
921 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though.
- 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM
945 Views
That is a very confusing article.
- 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
1077 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different
- 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM
1003 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies?
- 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM
953 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM*
- 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM
424 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics...
- 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM
1113 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM*
- 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM
465 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument?
- 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM
955 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM*
- 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM
512 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better.
- 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM
1002 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
- 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM
1106 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug*
- 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM
1010 Views
Can you back that up?
- 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM
1128 Views
Re: Can you back that up?
- 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM
911 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living.
- 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM
1213 Views