Active Users:1356 Time:23/09/2026 03:51:58 PM
That is a very confusing article. Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
Every year, January 1st is "public domain day" around the globe. It's the day when all works that have had their copyrights expire enter the public domain, since copyright term is based on the year of publication, rather than the exact date. While some parts of the world still have something to celebrate on public domain day -- such as how the works of James Joyce are now in the public domain in the EU, here in the US as we've noted in the past, we're left waiting... for nothing. Because thanks to massive changes to copyright law, as well as copyright term extension, absolutely nothing has or will enter the public domain for many years in the US (minus a specific declaration by the copyright holder... and even then it's not entirely clear that qualifies).

See, after this paragraph I want to know whether, how and why the US deviates from what I thought was the general rule (with the odd exception in some less important country here or there) of things being released to the public domain seventy years after death of author/composer/whatever.

Oh wait, I think I get it now... the US does not deviate from that rule at all, but the point is merely that due to the law having changed at some point in the relatively recent past, the net effect is that for the next few decades nothing will enter the public domain because the works that normally *would* be entering public domain after seventy years after death of author, are already in it thanks to the looser rules before.

Seems a bit silly to be whining about nothing entering the public domain, then, and especially silly to make that comparison to the EU, as they use the exact same public domain rules as the US now.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 2116 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1222 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 1185 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 1129 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1203 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 1165 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1208 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 625 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 788 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1481 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1265 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 1155 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1372 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1190 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1255 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 1126 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1227 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1634 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 1127 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1799 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1300 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1221 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 1153 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 519 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1296 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 554 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 1115 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1193 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1327 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1213 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1277 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1219 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1228 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1411 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1332 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 1096 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1344 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1421 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 1167 Views

Reply to Message