Active Users:1036 Time:22/11/2024 06:38:28 AM
That is a very confusing article. Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
Every year, January 1st is "public domain day" around the globe. It's the day when all works that have had their copyrights expire enter the public domain, since copyright term is based on the year of publication, rather than the exact date. While some parts of the world still have something to celebrate on public domain day -- such as how the works of James Joyce are now in the public domain in the EU, here in the US as we've noted in the past, we're left waiting... for nothing. Because thanks to massive changes to copyright law, as well as copyright term extension, absolutely nothing has or will enter the public domain for many years in the US (minus a specific declaration by the copyright holder... and even then it's not entirely clear that qualifies).

See, after this paragraph I want to know whether, how and why the US deviates from what I thought was the general rule (with the odd exception in some less important country here or there) of things being released to the public domain seventy years after death of author/composer/whatever.

Oh wait, I think I get it now... the US does not deviate from that rule at all, but the point is merely that due to the law having changed at some point in the relatively recent past, the net effect is that for the next few decades nothing will enter the public domain because the works that normally *would* be entering public domain after seventy years after death of author, are already in it thanks to the looser rules before.

Seems a bit silly to be whining about nothing entering the public domain, then, and especially silly to make that comparison to the EU, as they use the exact same public domain rules as the US now.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1789 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 922 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 852 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 860 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 906 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 880 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 920 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 494 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 629 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1141 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 948 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 880 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1040 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 879 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 909 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 824 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 912 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1310 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 843 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1456 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 976 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 901 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 852 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 387 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1007 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 422 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 831 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 888 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1002 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 906 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 994 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 901 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 927 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1085 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1026 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 818 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1016 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1119 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 868 Views

Reply to Message