Active Users:1863 Time:05/02/2025 09:20:53 PM
That is a very confusing article. Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
Every year, January 1st is "public domain day" around the globe. It's the day when all works that have had their copyrights expire enter the public domain, since copyright term is based on the year of publication, rather than the exact date. While some parts of the world still have something to celebrate on public domain day -- such as how the works of James Joyce are now in the public domain in the EU, here in the US as we've noted in the past, we're left waiting... for nothing. Because thanks to massive changes to copyright law, as well as copyright term extension, absolutely nothing has or will enter the public domain for many years in the US (minus a specific declaration by the copyright holder... and even then it's not entirely clear that qualifies).

See, after this paragraph I want to know whether, how and why the US deviates from what I thought was the general rule (with the odd exception in some less important country here or there) of things being released to the public domain seventy years after death of author/composer/whatever.

Oh wait, I think I get it now... the US does not deviate from that rule at all, but the point is merely that due to the law having changed at some point in the relatively recent past, the net effect is that for the next few decades nothing will enter the public domain because the works that normally *would* be entering public domain after seventy years after death of author, are already in it thanks to the looser rules before.

Seems a bit silly to be whining about nothing entering the public domain, then, and especially silly to make that comparison to the EU, as they use the exact same public domain rules as the US now.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1836 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 967 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 898 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 887 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 951 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 923 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 957 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 508 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 651 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1188 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 989 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 922 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1089 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 921 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 957 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 866 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 953 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1355 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 886 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1493 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1018 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 945 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 894 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 403 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1052 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 444 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 873 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 926 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1045 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 949 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1036 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 949 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 971 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1128 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1066 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 860 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1061 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1163 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 912 Views

Reply to Message