The ruins have more personality than most of the characters! For that matter, I know more about Aragorn's genealogy than I do Aragorn as a person.
And that's a problem.
It isn't for me. I think that the way Tolkien wrote it, these characters fit perfectly into the history that was prepared for them. It isn't so much a story about the people. It's about showing that there ARE people involved in each step of the epic. Real people, and love, bonds, mistakes, etc. So, anyway. I don't care if others don't agree
, but I have no issue with the way he wrote this all as a whole.
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings
- 12/12/2011 04:25:26 AM
1656 Views
Thank you for reposting these.
- 12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM
943 Views
Interestingly enough
- 13/12/2011 12:10:08 AM
788 Views
Re: Interestingly enough
- 13/12/2011 12:42:10 PM
769 Views
I think
- 13/12/2011 01:21:41 PM
834 Views
Probably, yes, but still no excuse for allowing the worldbuilding to overpower the story being told.
- 13/12/2011 04:00:23 PM
774 Views
We'll have to disagree.
- 14/12/2011 12:46:23 AM
790 Views
Re-reads after a long period of time can lead to surprising results
- 13/12/2011 01:02:23 AM
890 Views
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic".
- 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM
848 Views
Oh, I know that
- 14/12/2011 08:25:53 AM
839 Views
I love the dialogue in LOTR. a more modern voice would be terrible *NM*
- 15/12/2011 06:09:18 PM
375 Views