Active Users:1099 Time:22/11/2024 06:14:59 PM
Thank you for reposting these. Macharius Send a noteboard - 12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM
I remember your 2009 posting, but any discussion has long since faded from memory without looking it up again.

In many ways, my perception of the books has largely followed that of your first and now third readings. I suspect I'm still too much of an action junkie to appreciate the Frodo/Sam relationship to the same extent you did, but for me it really did come down to being the most relate-able points of the story.

What changed for me was having (finally) read the Silmarillion in 2007. Reading Lord of the Rings after that, just felt flat... like your comments throughout the review that it was the background history coming through far too strongly for what the nominal story was to be interesting in its own right.
Reply to message
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings - 12/12/2011 04:25:26 AM 1656 Views
Thank you for reposting these. - 12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM 943 Views
Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:10:08 AM 788 Views
Re: Interestingly enough - 13/12/2011 12:42:10 PM 769 Views
I think - 13/12/2011 01:21:41 PM 834 Views
Probably, yes, but still no excuse for allowing the worldbuilding to overpower the story being told. - 13/12/2011 04:00:23 PM 774 Views
We'll have to disagree. - 14/12/2011 12:46:23 AM 789 Views
Alright. - 14/12/2011 12:40:25 PM 872 Views
for the sake of the history/epic? - 14/12/2011 02:40:33 PM 790 Views
Everyone cares about their own bit of history. - 14/12/2011 04:24:16 PM 763 Views
Agreed - 23/12/2011 05:27:02 AM 781 Views
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic". - 14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM 848 Views
Oh, I know that - 14/12/2011 08:25:53 AM 839 Views
I love the dialogue in LOTR. a more modern voice would be terrible *NM* - 15/12/2011 06:09:18 PM 375 Views
You might want to re-read what I said more carefully - 15/12/2011 07:03:23 PM 828 Views

Reply to Message