Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced?
Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
- 1742 Views
I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
- 1307 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
- 1387 Views
Hmm
23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
- 1334 Views
Re: Hmm
24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
- 1305 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
- 1263 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
- 1208 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
- 1272 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
- 1283 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
- 1345 Views
It does sound really good
23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
- 1188 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
- 1257 Views
Highly monogamous
23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
- 1240 Views
This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
- 1289 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
- 1304 Views
best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
- 1308 Views
Re: best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
- 1136 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
- 1327 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
- 1252 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
- 721 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
- 693 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
- 1150 Views
RT stole my post title.
23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
- 1357 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
- 1274 Views
Totally slutty
24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
- 1320 Views
Re: Totally slutty
24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
- 1345 Views
24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
- 1168 Views
Re:
24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
- 1121 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
- 1163 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
- 1330 Views
That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
- 1265 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
- 1141 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
- 1218 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
- 1316 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
- 1402 Views
where?
24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
- 1179 Views
Here
24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
- 1302 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
- 1266 Views