Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced?
Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
- 1758 Views
I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
- 1327 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
- 1404 Views
Hmm
23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
- 1346 Views
Re: Hmm
24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
- 1320 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
- 1277 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
- 1219 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
- 1285 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
- 1296 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
- 1360 Views
It does sound really good
23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
- 1200 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
- 1267 Views
Highly monogamous
23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
- 1254 Views
This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
- 1302 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
- 1320 Views
best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
- 1321 Views
Re: best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
- 1149 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
- 1340 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
- 1267 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
- 724 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
- 699 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
- 1165 Views
RT stole my post title.
23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
- 1370 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
- 1286 Views
Totally slutty
24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
- 1335 Views
Re: Totally slutty
24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
- 1359 Views
24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
- 1184 Views
Re:
24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
- 1139 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
- 1179 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
- 1344 Views
That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
- 1279 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
- 1156 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
- 1235 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
- 1336 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
- 1415 Views
where?
24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
- 1190 Views
Here
24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
- 1315 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
- 1278 Views