Then, some time during my master's I realised it wasn't a good idea. I had wild cravings. But when I finished it, I did not want to read anything. It was rather horrible. I had barely read anything new that had not been for analysis and that I had to read for years, and reading just didn't seem relaxing anymore. I actually had to reaccustom myself to reading. So these days I read other books on the side. I learnt my lesson.
Exactly. Spending my whole day reading just discourages me from reading any more during my free time. I think when my exams end in 2 months I will have to train myself back.
That being said, maybe it's all a question of finding the right book. I keep persisting in trying to read books that I could have read for "pleasure" in high school, meaning Kundera and Malraux, and that's not working. On the other hand I managed to get through P&P & Zombies in about a week, because it was so ridiculous that it really did feel fun. I should just stick to lighter stuff for now, perhaps.
P.G Wodehouse, for example.
Or you know, Nick Harkaway.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
- 1742 Views
I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
- 1307 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
- 1388 Views
Hmm
23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
- 1335 Views
Re: Hmm
24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
- 1306 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
- 1264 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
- 1208 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
- 1272 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
- 1284 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
- 1346 Views
It does sound really good
23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
- 1188 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
- 1258 Views
Highly monogamous
23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
- 1240 Views
This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
- 1289 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
- 1304 Views
best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
- 1308 Views
Re: best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
- 1136 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
- 1327 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
- 1252 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
- 721 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
- 693 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
- 1151 Views
RT stole my post title.
23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
- 1357 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
- 1274 Views
Totally slutty
24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
- 1321 Views
Re: Totally slutty
24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
- 1345 Views
24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
- 1168 Views
Re:
24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
- 1121 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
- 1163 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
- 1331 Views
That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
- 1266 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
- 1141 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
- 1219 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
- 1316 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
- 1403 Views
where?
24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
- 1179 Views
Here
24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
- 1303 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
- 1267 Views