It is evident that he does not see Joyce as an innovator because he finds him mired in a Mediaeval Catholic Irish world. His studied attempts at distancing himself from this background are like, in Jung’s words, the aristocratic Bolshevik who revels in not shaving. Silly and symbolic gestures are taken to remove the author from his background, but it only reinforces that he is still a slave to a particular mindset.
I said this, or something very much like it, in one of the surveys you made when posting as Сталин. Actually, it was more like "expatriate Irish Catholic apostate", but whatever.
南無阿弥陀仏!
Carl Jung's thoughts on Ulysses by James Joyce
13/09/2011 04:28:21 PM
- 3247 Views
As far as I can tell, the main reason to read it is so you can say
13/09/2011 05:38:17 PM
- 964 Views
The length has nothing to do with it
13/09/2011 05:57:27 PM
- 1035 Views
Re: The length has nothing to do with it
13/09/2011 08:22:36 PM
- 870 Views
I tried the beginning of it once
14/09/2011 02:31:16 AM
- 898 Views
If you don't like it at about 75-100 pages in, you just won't like it. *NM*
15/09/2011 04:30:27 AM
- 367 Views
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me.
15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM
- 978 Views
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man was enough to stop me reading more Joyce.
15/09/2011 07:59:22 AM
- 923 Views
It was precisely because I liked A Portrait of the Artist that I tried Ulysses.
15/09/2011 03:46:31 PM
- 865 Views
Actually this is one of the few things I've disagreed with Jung on.
21/09/2011 12:23:34 AM
- 828 Views