Active Users:1109 Time:22/11/2024 06:23:52 PM
I don't think you can compare fantasy series and real literature Tom Send a noteboard - 13/09/2011 09:13:26 PM
It's like the difference between eating a cubic meter of cotton candy as opposed to a cubic meter of beef. People who read mystery novels or romance series can say the same thing, but the daunting nature of reading a long work of literature isn't just that it's long. It's that it's long and you actually have to concentrate.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Carl Jung's thoughts on Ulysses by James Joyce - 13/09/2011 04:28:21 PM 3233 Views
As far as I can tell, the main reason to read it is so you can say - 13/09/2011 05:38:17 PM 945 Views
The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 05:57:27 PM 1016 Views
Re: The length has nothing to do with it - 13/09/2011 08:22:36 PM 850 Views
I don't think you can compare fantasy series and real literature - 13/09/2011 09:13:26 PM 885 Views
...how are you even on this site? - 22/09/2011 04:38:43 PM 897 Views
I re-read it for the third time this spring - 14/09/2011 12:01:02 AM 1150 Views
I tried the beginning of it once - 14/09/2011 02:31:16 AM 873 Views
Took a class on it. - 14/09/2011 11:27:24 PM 920 Views
I could see a short class on it being interesting. - 15/09/2011 04:29:55 AM 839 Views
Never read it, never plan to. - 14/09/2011 11:45:51 PM 906 Views
Pretentious, unappealing and difficult to read. - 15/09/2011 04:25:05 AM 864 Views
Awesome! Jung seems to agree with me. - 15/09/2011 03:30:27 AM 955 Views
I particularly enjoyed that analogy - 15/09/2011 04:23:16 AM 874 Views
Actually this is one of the few things I've disagreed with Jung on. - 21/09/2011 12:23:34 AM 810 Views

Reply to Message