Active Users:339 Time:31/03/2025 12:15:11 PM
These results don't prove Naipaul wrong Corwin Send a noteboard - 30/06/2011 07:58:39 PM
There are always people out there who would claim that men and women write inherently different types of fiction/language/whatever. The latest such is V.S. Naipaul. I have always been sceptical of the claim and I find it absurd that a well respected author like Naipaul, who has spent his writing life tackling another form of marginalisation, would spout such nonsense.

Anyway. Here is a test. I'd be interested to hear what you get, as a semi-scientific sampling of the reading public (please let me know if you get something right because you recognise the passage).


The results of this test don't really prove or disprove Naipaul's claim. He never said that any differences in the writing of male and female authors are blatant, and if subtle nuances of gender are present in writing, the inability of the reading public to decipher them doesn't disprove their existence. Furthermore, small samples like the passages in this test obviously make it more difficult to distinguish gender, considering the proposition that male and female authors are different on some fundamental level does not mean that the language they use is necessarily dissimilar, but that they perceive the world around them in different ways, and therefore write about their perceptions in different ways. A couple of sentences is certainly not enough to get an accurate sense of an author's writing.
Reply to message
Sex and writing - 03/06/2011 03:45:43 PM 1408 Views
This test simply reinforced a completely different opinion of mine. - 03/06/2011 04:07:26 PM 865 Views
Literature reflects society. Welcome to the age of text messaging *NM* - 03/06/2011 06:08:53 PM 408 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 03/06/2011 10:14:05 PM 374 Views
I really disliked those excerpts as well - 04/06/2011 02:10:36 AM 815 Views
5/10. Exactly as chance would predict. *NM* - 22/06/2011 11:27:25 AM 384 Views
6/10 - 03/06/2011 04:34:19 PM 788 Views
9/10: Not bad, but you're no Sir Vidia - 03/06/2011 04:56:08 PM 991 Views
6/10! *NM* - 03/06/2011 06:06:09 PM 381 Views
7/10. - 03/06/2011 07:15:44 PM 909 Views
6/10. Would be 7/10 but I thought #10 was a trick question. *NM* - 03/06/2011 07:17:51 PM 376 Views
8/10, but that is really largely luck if you ask me. - 03/06/2011 07:45:07 PM 897 Views
7/10 - 03/06/2011 09:52:40 PM 836 Views
5/10 I was guessing on all of them though. - 03/06/2011 11:19:09 PM 807 Views
8/10 - 04/06/2011 12:54:02 AM 837 Views
Guessed all the way through. 2/10 - 04/06/2011 04:06:08 AM 750 Views
9/10, but that doesn't mean a thing... - 04/06/2011 08:06:00 AM 841 Views
I also got 4 out of 10 - 04/06/2011 02:17:50 PM 871 Views
At the same time? - 06/06/2011 04:54:09 PM 848 Views
7/10 *NM* - 22/06/2011 08:49:07 PM 408 Views
These results don't prove Naipaul wrong - 30/06/2011 07:58:39 PM 961 Views

Reply to Message