No, because by definition one cannot read pictures.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 02/06/2011 01:39:12 AM
I'd peruse it, though, and probably enjoy it.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Would you read this book?
02/06/2011 01:32:11 AM
- 1263 Views
No, because by definition one cannot read pictures.
02/06/2011 01:39:12 AM
- 838 Views
That depends entirely on your definition of reading *NM*
02/06/2011 03:28:30 PM
- 339 Views
I hope you realize how tautological that was. *NM*
02/06/2011 06:50:54 PM
- 321 Views
I merely made the tautology explicit. It was already there in your claim.
02/06/2011 09:23:28 PM
- 831 Views
I wouldn't go out of my way to do so.
02/06/2011 03:01:43 AM
- 744 Views
how often have you read a book that you haven't gone out of your way to do so?
02/06/2011 02:59:37 PM
- 802 Views
That looks like Jonah without the whale. Or maybe I'm just weird that way.
02/06/2011 09:15:42 AM
- 896 Views