Active Users:1068 Time:22/11/2024 10:32:17 AM
I don't quite agree Tom Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
Being the pedantic person I am, I'd argue that there is no more suspense in such a situation than there would otherwise be, though when the bigger army wins there would be a surprise.

However, even if the bigger army were to win, it would have to lead to some other event happening that would make the victory hollow (like in Sanderson's Mistborn, where the rebel army is crushed but it leads to other events). After all, if the big army wins, and wins totally, with no other event to mitigate the victory, there's no more story - it's just a static situation.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM 1221 Views
It's an essential plot device - 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM 880 Views
Yeah but... - 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM 843 Views
I don't quite agree - 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM 789 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that... - 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM 716 Views
Fail. - 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM 930 Views
Agreed. - 21/09/2009 04:59:39 AM 823 Views
Well there are plenty of authors not in their right minds - 21/09/2009 05:49:22 PM 745 Views
True. - 21/09/2009 06:50:43 PM 822 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM 983 Views
That, and... - 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM 842 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby! - 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM 777 Views
That is not even fantasy... - 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM 775 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM 331 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM 318 Views
Doubleplusungood. - 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM 774 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM* - 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM 326 Views
Who knew? ¯\(°O)/¯ *NM* - 25/09/2009 02:07:19 AM 313 Views
I... don't know what those symbols mean. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:04:13 AM 345 Views
Wheel of Time? - 20/09/2009 11:52:36 PM 750 Views
I have not found that to be always true - 21/09/2009 12:52:00 AM 720 Views
The smaller army doesn't always win - 21/09/2009 02:47:07 AM 752 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win. - 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM 795 Views
everybody loves an under dog *NM* - 21/09/2009 03:51:12 PM 325 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM* - 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM 348 Views
Exactly what I was going to say - 27/09/2009 02:55:02 PM 838 Views

Reply to Message