Wow. Very opinionated. It would be offensive if I cared about what she thought but I don't.
Tashmere Send a noteboard - 18/04/2011 02:08:52 AM
You know, I don't read GRRM, but articles like this make me wish I did, so I could be more annoyed than I am at this reviewer. amongst other things, she seems to have no problems admitting that she has viewing ADD, and she also seems to think all women want in their viewing is sexy sex.
This is a link to the original article:
http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/arts/television/game-of-thrones-begins-sunday-on-hbo-review.html
This is a link to the original article:
http://tv.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/arts/television/game-of-thrones-begins-sunday-on-hbo-review.html
I love the series. I am not sure if I want to see it graphically depicted. It was graphic enough in my imagination but I would love to see it on the screen without the graphic sex and violence. The story holds up well enough without it.
The current GRRM shitstorm: some weirdo on the Game of Thrones series.
15/04/2011 05:46:21 PM
- 2990 Views
Horrbile review, if you can call it that.
15/04/2011 06:48:45 PM
- 1084 Views
The NYT review was internally inconsistent and largely incoherent.
15/04/2011 07:34:57 PM
- 1528 Views
My god, that was painful
15/04/2011 11:02:11 PM
- 986 Views
The original reviewer appears not only to be an outdated snob but an idiot
16/04/2011 11:51:29 PM
- 872 Views
Wow. Very opinionated. It would be offensive if I cared about what she thought but I don't.
18/04/2011 02:08:52 AM
- 863 Views
That's an interesting question.
18/04/2011 04:33:48 AM
- 819 Views
It mostly irks me that women will read this and think, "I shouldn't bother with that show."
18/04/2011 07:07:13 AM
- 917 Views