You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
Werthead Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
RAFO has definitely not gotten off to the best start as it is, and the inaction of the moderators over this troll is frankly ridiculous at this time.
Oh, wait, did I say that to a GRRM fan? That is simply not allowed! lol
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1199 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 494 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 402 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 464 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 485 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 456 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 420 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 370 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 376 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 344 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 334 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 331 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 515 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 443 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 359 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 420 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 459 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 418 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 455 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 329 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 469 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 423 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 316 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 360 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 360 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 390 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 394 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 343 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 274 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 338 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 393 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 376 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 397 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 386 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 359 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 404 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 385 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 420 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 365 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 350 Views