Trolling threads with deliberate misinformation, personally insulting other board members when they've caught him out and so forth is acceptable here?
Is this really the level of conduct RAFO is going to tolerate in the future?
Is this really the level of conduct RAFO is going to tolerate in the future?
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1175 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 473 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 373 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 439 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 461 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 432 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 396 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 340 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 361 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 320 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 311 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 306 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 489 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 421 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 328 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 397 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 438 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 394 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 430 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 301 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 444 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 398 Views
For several reasons. *NM*
19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM
- 289 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 292 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 335 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 333 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 368 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 368 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 316 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 253 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 314 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 368 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 350 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 370 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 361 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 331 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 375 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 358 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 398 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 340 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 331 Views