Life is much nicer when your panties aren't in a bunch all the time. It is okay to lighten up.
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
- 1174 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
- 472 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
- 373 Views
Titles
18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
- 439 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
- 460 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
- 431 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
- 395 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
- 339 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
- 360 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
- 319 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
- 310 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
- 306 Views
I see the reason in that.
20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 489 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
- 420 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
- 327 Views
Sometimes ...
18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
- 396 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
- 437 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
- 393 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
- 429 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
- 300 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
- 443 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
- 398 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
- 292 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
- 334 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
- 332 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
- 367 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
- 367 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
- 315 Views
Irony overdose. Again.
19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM
- 337 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
- 252 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
- 314 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
- 367 Views
Agreed.
19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
- 349 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
- 369 Views
But a promise was never made.
19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
- 360 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
- 331 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
- 374 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
- 357 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
- 397 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
- 340 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
- 331 Views