Life is much nicer when your panties aren't in a bunch all the time. It is okay to lighten up. 

Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons....
- 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM
1234 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two.
- 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM
533 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM*
- 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM
441 Views
Titles
- 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM
496 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam"
- 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM
529 Views
Nope, still doesn't work.
- 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM
500 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else
- 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
457 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM*
- 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM
404 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks
- 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM
410 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM
380 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM
374 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions.
- 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM
363 Views
I see the reason in that.
- 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM
558 Views
I haven't even finished reading A Clash of Kings and I'm a touch annoyed by Martin already
- 20/09/2009 02:35:32 AM
481 Views
I can see my rule of not reading series that have not been finished is paying off.
- 18/09/2009 11:00:37 AM
396 Views
Sometimes ...
- 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM
460 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder.
- 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM
492 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety.
- 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM
457 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance?
- 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM
489 Views
damn you are rude *NM*
- 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM
366 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring.
- 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM
504 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly?
- 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM
464 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM
349 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults.
- 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM
398 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin.
- 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM
392 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been.
- 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM
424 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was.
- 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM
430 Views
Nope, I'm someone simply a hell of a lot better informed about the situation then you. Deal with it. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 02:40:07 AM
381 Views
Irony overdose. Again.
- 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM
398 Views
I'd agree with you except for the fact that there was the 'promise'. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 05:59:21 PM
325 Views
Gaiman would just turn the episode into an amazing graphic novel as he died. *NM*
- 19/09/2009 01:06:30 PM
385 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument.
- 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM
431 Views
Agreed.
- 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM
416 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'.
- 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM
433 Views
But a promise was never made.
- 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM
420 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM
391 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin
- 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM
445 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play
- 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM
422 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book
- 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM
454 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise."
- 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM
405 Views
Exceptions prove the rule...
- 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM
391 Views



