Active Users:1218 Time:23/11/2024 04:31:47 AM
that would be very counter productive imlad Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM
The interesting thing is that if angry Martin readers got together and sued, I'm not entirely sure that the case wouldn't succeed.


he'd have to waste all the time with lawyers and depositions and in court.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1174 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 342 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 305 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 472 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 373 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 439 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 460 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 431 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 324 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 356 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 339 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 360 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 319 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 310 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 306 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 489 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 372 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 425 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 397 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 293 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 374 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 473 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 397 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 386 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 437 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 393 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 429 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 300 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 443 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 398 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 288 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 292 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 334 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 323 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 333 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 367 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 291 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 368 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 363 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 285 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 347 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 328 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 337 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 378 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 368 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 328 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 320 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 368 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 349 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 369 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 360 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 331 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 374 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 357 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 397 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 342 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 347 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 273 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 407 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 340 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 331 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 318 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 315 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 368 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 325 Views