Active Users:1152 Time:23/11/2024 04:52:18 AM
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else Tom Send a noteboard - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM
1. I was hoping Tor (read: Bantam) is putting pressure on Martin. I see that sadly, this is not the case.

2. I said that I had lost interest in the series, and honestly I know a lot of other people who have likewise lost interest in the series. That translates into lower revenue. All of this is true - I stated my opinion, the opinions of my friends and the market effect of that sentiment. Citing Wheel of Time does not really help your argument, either. Look at the general consensus on Crossroads of Twilight - the fan base was drifting. If Jordan had not started to wrap things up with Knife of Dreams the fan base would have been lost. I never said it had reached a critical mass, only that Martin would do well to remember his promises.

3. Martin has a pilot with HBO - are you aware of something I'm not? Did they already sign for a full season?

4. The entirety of the statement "your whole post was about how ADWD was going to be pointless, and nothing in it of any importance was going to happen because those events have been pushed back to a later book" is completely wrong. I never said anything remotely like that.

In fact, to summarize, I simply said (a) A Feast for Crows was bad because the good character lines were missing, (b) the book that was originally designated A Dance With Dragons is a different book as a result, (c) I'm not happy, other people aren't happy and the result on the market could be negative, and (d) this series could drag out for years and years.

Absolutely none of the above are "fictitious points". So I'll just ignore the rest of your obnoxious petty douchebag last paragraph.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Now I understand why everyone has been bitching about a Dance of Dragons.... - 18/09/2009 12:36:21 AM 1175 Views
Welcome my son....welcome to the machine...... *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:06:36 AM 342 Views
lol Nice. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:28:08 AM 306 Views
It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. - 18/09/2009 03:10:35 AM 472 Views
Re: It's not just that. He split A Feast for Crows into two. *NM* - 18/09/2009 04:04:06 AM 373 Views
Titles - 18/09/2009 04:15:24 AM 439 Views
Ok, Martin is published by Bantam...replace "Tor" with "Bantam" - 18/09/2009 05:43:51 PM 461 Views
Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 08:49:09 PM 431 Views
I would recommend you re-read my post - you're confusing me with someone else - 18/09/2009 10:24:24 PM 396 Views
Re: Nope, still doesn't work. - 18/09/2009 10:46:59 PM 325 Views
Is this the thread in which you'll FINALLY reveal... - 20/09/2009 12:31:49 AM 356 Views
Remember what The Neil said: "GRRM is not your bitch!" *NM* - 18/09/2009 07:32:47 AM 340 Views
I don't give a shit what Neil Gaiman thinks - 18/09/2009 05:35:54 PM 360 Views
Gaiman = The Most Overrated Author of the New Milennium. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:33:10 AM 320 Views
In your opinion, of course. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:28:33 AM 311 Views
Yes, and this entire thread deals with opinions. - 20/09/2009 01:52:21 AM 306 Views
I see the reason in that. - 20/09/2009 02:13:46 AM 489 Views
He might be a good comic book author, I don't know - 20/09/2009 03:05:15 AM 373 Views
I see where there might be a misunderstanding. - 20/09/2009 03:05:24 AM 425 Views
You're the man, Wert. - 20/09/2009 03:29:41 AM 398 Views
Still ruling WOT, I see. How's that going? *NM* - 18/09/2009 03:26:15 AM 293 Views
Very well, thanks - 18/09/2009 04:05:16 AM 374 Views
One thing I got to say about Robert Jordan... - 18/09/2009 03:40:20 AM 473 Views
Sometimes ... - 18/09/2009 05:07:18 AM 397 Views
I agree! - 18/09/2009 01:39:04 PM 387 Views
Sometimes...Neil Gaiman should be thrown into a meat grinder. - 18/09/2009 05:49:56 PM 438 Views
You paid for a product. You got a product. That is the end of the matter in its entirety. - 18/09/2009 09:03:05 PM 393 Views
Was this well out of line, by any chance? - 18/09/2009 10:25:57 PM 430 Views
damn you are rude *NM* - 18/09/2009 10:51:19 PM 300 Views
Gosh. This is pretty tiring. - 18/09/2009 11:25:51 PM 444 Views
So this guy still hasn't been banned yet, why exactly? - 19/09/2009 04:13:05 PM 398 Views
For several reasons. *NM* - 19/09/2009 10:15:38 PM 288 Views
Get off your high horse. Someone disagrees with you. Deal with it. *NM* - 20/09/2009 12:35:24 AM 292 Views
No, this guy is breaching the forum rules on attacks and insults. - 20/09/2009 02:57:20 AM 334 Views
What would you call a good start? - 20/09/2009 03:25:46 AM 323 Views
Oh please. Grow some thicker skin. - 20/09/2009 03:26:33 AM 333 Views
You think this behaviour would have been tolerated on Wotmania? It definitely would not have been. - 20/09/2009 03:31:20 AM 368 Views
That is factually incorrect. *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:38:06 AM 292 Views
"It" would have been. "It" was. - 20/09/2009 05:45:14 AM 368 Views
Depends on which section of wotmania you're thinking about - 20/09/2009 06:54:00 AM 363 Views
Precisely. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:30:12 AM 286 Views
I half agree... - 20/09/2009 04:35:22 AM 347 Views
What's with the ad hominems, Tom? - 20/09/2009 06:57:33 AM 328 Views
Irony overdose. Again. - 19/09/2009 06:28:49 AM 337 Views
WTF? - 20/09/2009 01:49:23 AM 378 Views
- 20/09/2009 03:00:53 AM 369 Views
that would be very counter productive - 18/09/2009 10:50:01 PM 328 Views
Depends on what you want. - 18/09/2009 11:26:54 PM 320 Views
That's the most valid point of the argument. - 18/09/2009 11:54:26 PM 368 Views
Agreed. - 19/09/2009 03:02:48 AM 350 Views
Now to me that supports Tom's point about 'reliance theory'. - 19/09/2009 05:55:28 PM 370 Views
But a promise was never made. - 19/09/2009 06:04:55 PM 361 Views
I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 07:14:30 PM 331 Views
Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 07:55:01 PM 375 Views
This is where the great divide comes into play - 19/09/2009 08:10:09 PM 358 Views
I think he should take a page out of RJ's book - 19/09/2009 08:36:55 PM 398 Views
Excellent point. - 19/09/2009 10:09:36 PM 343 Views
Re: Excellent point. - 20/09/2009 12:21:21 AM 348 Views
That would be the best policy. *NM* - 19/09/2009 11:23:48 PM 273 Views
Re: Who is GGK and where is his article? + my opinion on Martin - 19/09/2009 11:22:25 PM 408 Views
Re: I think we're hung up on the definition of "promise." - 19/09/2009 08:04:53 PM 340 Views
Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 08:42:39 PM 331 Views
Re: Exceptions prove the rule... - 19/09/2009 10:00:35 PM 319 Views
I think we're winding down here. - 20/09/2009 07:41:15 AM 316 Views
Yeah. - 19/09/2009 11:27:04 PM 368 Views
Don't mind me, I just can't post in the right place. *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:13:25 PM 325 Views