Active Users:432 Time:26/12/2024 12:55:24 AM
That looks like pretty standard fare stuff. No offense intended. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/01/2011 06:51:09 AM
I'm trying to nail down a sort of back to basics reading list for myself. I've read about half of those and know next to nothing of the others.

I plan to revisit Godot. Beckett is brilliant.

Why do you have Conrad on there? He's quite possibly the most overrated author that i have come across in the history of the English language. Wretched, stilted writing.

I'd go with the Chaucer, the Boccacio, and the Beckett.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
So you're given a list of books from which to choose those you want to know more about... - 30/01/2011 04:13:47 AM 1133 Views
That looks like pretty standard fare stuff. No offense intended. - 30/01/2011 06:51:09 AM 848 Views
I'm mostly revisiting books I read in my late teens to mid-20s - 30/01/2011 07:42:48 AM 881 Views
The themes may improve. His inability to form any sort of coherent style likely will remain. - 30/01/2011 08:55:10 PM 784 Views
I disagree. Quite strongly, actually. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:10:34 PM 405 Views
Well, you're entitled to be wrong. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 379 Views
These ones: - 30/01/2011 01:07:58 PM 882 Views
Don't choose Gurney! - 30/01/2011 02:23:14 PM 890 Views
I'm just intrigued by someone writing about the Hittites. *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:15:00 PM 368 Views
There is a much better book on the Hittites, though. - 31/01/2011 02:11:03 AM 735 Views
I think Camilla ought to read Flight to Lucifer - 30/01/2011 04:42:32 PM 822 Views
I am doing very well pretending Bloom does not exist - 30/01/2011 06:54:24 PM 714 Views
You might like his novel, though - 30/01/2011 07:03:09 PM 712 Views
Re: You might like his novel, though - 30/01/2011 07:12:30 PM 845 Views
Not too badly - 30/01/2011 07:21:03 PM 713 Views
S'why I chose it. *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:15:29 PM 445 Views
Ha! *NM* - 30/01/2011 07:20:23 PM 420 Views
Okay. - 30/01/2011 01:13:24 PM 771 Views
The number of votes for Chaucer is curious - 30/01/2011 04:41:37 PM 856 Views
I find Chaucer less interesting than Boccaccio *NM* - 30/01/2011 06:50:44 PM 417 Views
I'm divided on the two - 30/01/2011 07:02:32 PM 736 Views
Well... could be an international readership? - 30/01/2011 07:38:51 PM 815 Views
Very possible, considering 1/3 or so of the blog's readership isn't Anglo-American *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:11:26 PM 394 Views
Re: Very possible, considering 1/3 or so of the blog's readership isn't Anglo-American - 30/01/2011 11:04:11 PM 723 Views
There is that as well - 02/02/2011 03:52:40 AM 855 Views
Re: There is that as well - 02/02/2011 11:57:26 AM 987 Views
Very true. *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:12:46 PM 405 Views
Hm. - 30/01/2011 09:35:18 PM 1161 Views
Heathen! - 02/02/2011 03:55:46 AM 959 Views
Beckett, Boccaccio, Calvino. *NM* - 30/01/2011 10:29:38 PM 529 Views
Hmm ... - 31/01/2011 12:20:37 AM 1128 Views

Reply to Message