At least with books like ERAGON and TWILIGHT you can see 'why' they became mega-sellers, even though they are utter shite and somewhat offensive (such as TWILIGHT's intriguing brand of anti-feminism and ERAGON's lawsuit-baiting ripping off of STAR WARS). Aimed at younger readers who don't know better, cashing in on a general fantasy/vampire 'buzz' created by other factors etc.
THE DA VINCI CODE's success was weird because in 2003 saying that the Catholic Church has made a lot of mistakes and that the Bible is essentially a roughly thrown-together work which omits dozens of other viable manuscripts from the same period was hardly new. Brown clearly plagiarised a lot of his ideas from non-fiction books (some of them also suspect) going back to the 1970s. So the success of the book is totally inexplicable. Other religion-baiting novels released since have not done nearly as well either.
At the same time, Brown isn't totally awful (he's much better than Paolini and Meyer, to use the above examples), he's just very dull and middle-of-the-road.
THE DA VINCI CODE's success was weird because in 2003 saying that the Catholic Church has made a lot of mistakes and that the Bible is essentially a roughly thrown-together work which omits dozens of other viable manuscripts from the same period was hardly new. Brown clearly plagiarised a lot of his ideas from non-fiction books (some of them also suspect) going back to the 1970s. So the success of the book is totally inexplicable. Other religion-baiting novels released since have not done nearly as well either.
At the same time, Brown isn't totally awful (he's much better than Paolini and Meyer, to use the above examples), he's just very dull and middle-of-the-road.
The ideas about Mary Magdalen, the Marsilia connection and da Vinci were hardly new, true, but they weren't widely known. He had somewhat of a fanbase already from his older books, and that combined with the topic of the new book set off the hype... and of course once a hype starts, it just feeds on itself to grow bigger and bigger.
Why is it that so many people hate Dan Brown?
14/09/2009 09:24:31 PM
- 2241 Views
His prose is bad. Very bad.
14/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
- 1090 Views
It's not any worse than Robert Jordan's prose. I'd say it's better, in fact.
14/09/2009 09:30:17 PM
- 960 Views
Re: It's not any worse than Robert Jordan's prose. I'd say it's better, in fact.
14/09/2009 09:32:44 PM
- 1118 Views
In defense of italics...
14/09/2009 11:58:35 PM
- 1042 Views
Re: In defense of italics...
15/09/2009 08:02:56 AM
- 1067 Views
Thereby...
15/09/2009 10:31:44 PM
- 1007 Views
I have a problem with comparing those italics.
15/09/2009 10:33:53 PM
- 1012 Views
Oh probably
15/09/2009 10:40:15 PM
- 1010 Views
Hehe
15/09/2009 10:42:23 PM
- 1094 Views
In defense of nothing in particular...
15/09/2009 11:16:09 PM
- 1097 Views
Ah. Leroux did publish it as a serial in magazine first so that makes sense. *NM*
15/09/2009 11:19:40 PM
- 490 Views
Jordan didn't have the good sense TO FINISH ANY FUCKING PLOT THREAD
15/09/2009 04:46:06 AM
- 987 Views
Wow, the vehemence.
15/09/2009 05:55:38 AM
- 1011 Views
Riddle me this, Batman - if he weren't dying, would he have even done that? *NM*
15/09/2009 01:53:57 PM
- 587 Views
Re: Jordan didn't have the good sense TO FINISH ANY FUCKING PLOT THREAD
15/09/2009 08:05:26 AM
- 1019 Views
His attitude to history isn't really any different from that of most writers
15/09/2009 01:54:55 PM
- 985 Views
I vehemently disagree with this!
14/09/2009 09:33:05 PM
- 1270 Views
How many chapters of Aes Sedai dresses and horse names did we go through in his books?
15/09/2009 04:45:04 AM
- 1029 Views
I'd have a slow moving plot to fast moving nonsense any day.
15/09/2009 05:36:20 AM
- 1086 Views
With Jordan, that movement was glacial
15/09/2009 01:58:08 PM
- 982 Views
So plot progression is all that matters? What about the other stuff I mentioned? *NM*
15/09/2009 04:50:06 PM
- 462 Views
Jordan's characters are just as two-dimensional as Brown's
16/09/2009 02:17:19 AM
- 939 Views
Bull...
16/09/2009 03:15:49 AM
- 989 Views
No, I think you're just blinded by liking WoT
17/09/2009 03:00:28 PM
- 950 Views
No, you seem to be blinded by disliking him, more like.
17/09/2009 06:25:21 PM
- 968 Views
It's not hyperbole.
17/09/2009 08:13:47 PM
- 992 Views
Yes, it is, and you're really going to have to back your stance up with arguments.
17/09/2009 09:21:56 PM
- 1009 Views
Yeah like that's not the case with you and Dan Brown.
17/09/2009 06:56:37 PM
- 1013 Views
Because he is shit?
14/09/2009 09:38:59 PM
- 1228 Views
Camilla, you've read shit before and liked it.
15/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
- 997 Views
Re: Camilla, you've read shit before and liked it.
15/09/2009 08:04:18 AM
- 983 Views
Hate is a strong word.
14/09/2009 09:44:02 PM
- 1097 Views
He still didn't dick around with us as long as Robert Jordan did. *NM*
15/09/2009 04:41:01 AM
- 504 Views
Elitism and frustration he sells so much and better authors don't?
14/09/2009 09:51:39 PM
- 932 Views
Given that I know nothing about Dan Brown
14/09/2009 09:54:15 PM
- 1078 Views
A couple of the above points, and Suspension of Disbelief.
14/09/2009 10:23:26 PM
- 1040 Views
Good point about the "Ridiculous Things", that bugged me too.
14/09/2009 10:35:32 PM
- 1099 Views
there is a difference between a book, which is a respectable medium, and a hollywood movie.
14/09/2009 10:41:06 PM
- 944 Views
There is really only a difference if you're looking for some higher learnin'
14/09/2009 10:52:39 PM
- 1017 Views
Only to the strangest of elitists. *NM*
15/09/2009 12:49:53 AM
- 517 Views
I accept your points, but also your final statement
15/09/2009 04:38:46 AM
- 932 Views
More to the point then... people don't really need a good reason to hate something in particular.
15/09/2009 06:00:33 AM
- 1007 Views
To put Brown's mediocrity in perspective, read Da Vinci and then Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco. *NM*
15/09/2009 01:32:11 AM
- 515 Views
Eh, I enjoyed DaVinci better. You can all crucify me now.
15/09/2009 01:49:28 AM
- 934 Views
As someone who appreciated Foucault's Pendulum I don't argue his mediocrity.
15/09/2009 04:30:31 AM
- 831 Views
He was over hyped to me.
15/09/2009 04:15:32 AM
- 954 Views
Da Vinci, not "Da Vinchi". The latter would be pronounced like "Da Vinki" in English. *NM*
15/09/2009 04:32:40 AM
- 501 Views
I will fix it for for you. I just didn't care enough to look up the spelling on it.
15/09/2009 02:49:08 PM
- 1050 Views
The thing I hate the most is actually the fans who suddenly "know" stuff....
15/09/2009 07:49:22 AM
- 1083 Views
I try to avoid stupid people like that altogether
15/09/2009 01:49:53 PM
- 888 Views
My take on why Dan Brown is so disliked.
15/09/2009 08:51:04 AM
- 1052 Views
As I've said before, I don't disagree that he's a mediocre writer
15/09/2009 01:52:23 PM
- 934 Views
He 'true' book claims 5 million women were killed during the witch hunt
15/09/2009 11:55:40 AM
- 946 Views
I think it's more the totally inexplicable nature of his success
15/09/2009 03:48:28 PM
- 1112 Views
Eragon and Twilight indicate all that is evil to me in the world
15/09/2009 04:33:29 PM
- 1085 Views
I hardly think it's that inexplicable.
15/09/2009 04:33:39 PM
- 951 Views
Honestly, his works play on a very basic fact of human psychology.,
16/09/2009 02:23:56 AM
- 1047 Views
Misplaced superiority.
15/09/2009 05:10:34 PM
- 1024 Views
Well, regarding goodkind...
15/09/2009 05:23:34 PM
- 986 Views
It's pure literary snobbery
15/09/2009 11:08:44 PM
- 991 Views
Where does the rule come from that you can't read good books while travelling? It is nonsense!
18/09/2009 10:16:56 AM
- 1197 Views
I think you'll appreciate this Tom
16/09/2009 03:03:24 PM
- 1117 Views
I don't. I think he's just average, though occasionally fun for an easy read/skim *NM*
17/09/2009 12:39:05 AM
- 526 Views
Plenty of them probably don't. They just don't have the guts to say what they truly think. *NM*
17/09/2009 10:10:39 PM
- 477 Views
And yet there's still no "Why do so many people hate Faile?" post on the WoT board... *NM*
18/09/2009 04:05:26 PM
- 651 Views
How do you know? *NM*
18/09/2009 04:57:15 PM
- 520 Views