About every other book and it depends but probably more history then anything else
.



yes and mostly military history



some. My wife likes to read presdental biographies and I read some of those.



not in general and the n more from a historical point of view



some



science yes and mostly related to evalution or some times the history of science, when and how things were invented.

I am more likely to read science magazines then science books



not normally



not to much. Most if reads like so much BS



I read about arts some and if you include how to book then building as well



not unless it is in science magazine I am reading



I sometime listen to the NPR podcast "Books" does that count?



Killer Angels was very good but ask me next week and you will get a different answer.



More so then fiction actaully.



I tried reading this book about the Incas that was horrible. Which is to bad because the information was interesting it was just so poorly written. There was also a book on Marine Corps history that was ruined both both the gross bias and excissive triva. I really don't need to know who the adjatant of company was.



Lincoln as commader in chief (can't remember exact title) changed the way a looked at Lincoln and his leadership during the war.

I can't think of one that changed my entire world view. I guess On Liberty or Metaphysic of Morals changed the way look at morality but that was a long time ago.



I think it is fuzzy disction. Some biographies should be considered fiction.



Just hard backs I would say 60-40 nonfiction (I don't sell school books). If you count paper back those numbers flip. Throw in magazines and it goes back the other way.