I was just preparing a non-fiction review (as a low-key protest against the relegation of both Literature and Non-Fiction under Sci-Fi and Fantasy -- (yesyes, Ben, patience, I know I know)).
TMJ is wise.
Yes. What I read depends entirely on time, place and a myriad other variables, though. I will read quite a bit of history for fun, letters, popular science and of course masses and masses of literary theory.
yes (I studied it)
I do. It depends very much on the biographer, though.
yes (I studied it)
Mmmm. I am not sure what you mean. Anthropology-style? Or New Age happy clappy?
I adore it. I hate the fact that I cannot do it hard-core.
Yes (well, literary theory, mainly, but they tend to interact)
again, mainly through the glasses of literary theory, but there isn't really a separation.
no, not much.
I try to steer clear. Freud is unavoidable. I try to avoid Lacan, and I dread reading Kristeva. And apart from that, my interaction with psychology is accidental.
It is unavoidable, and really rather delicious.
You want me to choose? That is harsh.
I rarely reread anything except literary theory.
Derrida's Of Grammatology should be read more than it is. But so should Smoot's Wrinkles in Time. Barthes' S/Z and Mythologies. Oh, dear, you got me started. See, now I have mentioned some, there are others I don't feel I can leave out. Gah. No. Hmmm. Among those I have read lately, I'd say Conan Doyle's Letters are good. Hmm. I wrote a blog about that I English. Perhaps I should copy-past it here. It would function as a kind of review, I suppose. Feynman is good too. Stopping now.
Yes. I intend to provide some.
I try to steer clear of those I don't think I'll like. I wasn't entirely happy with Antonia Fraser's book on Mary Stuart. It was a bit "ooh, look how womanly and female she is in her strength and femininity". And I consider myself a feminist. I did enjoy her book on the Gunpowder Plot, though.
I had a really rather big epiphany when I first read S/Z. It was right at the beginning of my literature student days.
Depends on the book, I suppose.
I have no idea. But of those I have put up on LibraryThing, there are 209 out of 840.
I like.
Over half of the books I own are non-fiction. When one walks into bookstores (if anyone does that anymore), fiction usually accounts for half to a bit less than half of the store. Sure, some of the books are self-help crap and how-to books, but there is a significant volume of histories, biographies, books on philosophy and political theory, books on current events and topics and books on world cultures and religions.
I think it is worthwhile to post a survey to start people talking more about non-fiction on this website as well. To me, reading fantasy and science fiction all the time is a bit like eating junk food or playing computer games - it's fun and entertaining, but when you're done and look back on the time spent you sometimes sit there and say, "What have I done?!"
(Thinking back, it's still not as bad as having wasted an entire weekend watching TV Land's Benson marathon, as TMJ astutely pointed out to me at wotmania once)
TMJ is wise.
Non-fiction can be written in such a way that it is stimulating and exciting to read as well as useful for understanding points of view, historical events or current world problems.
So...my survey is as follows:
1. Do you read non-fiction on a regular basis? If so, what do you typically read?
Yes. What I read depends entirely on time, place and a myriad other variables, though. I will read quite a bit of history for fun, letters, popular science and of course masses and masses of literary theory.
2. Do you enjoy (whether you have read it recently or not) any of the following categories of books?
- history
yes (I studied it)
- biography
I do. It depends very much on the biographer, though.
- religion
yes (I studied it)
- world cultures
Mmmm. I am not sure what you mean. Anthropology-style? Or New Age happy clappy?
- science and mathematics
I adore it. I hate the fact that I cannot do it hard-core.
- political theory
Yes (well, literary theory, mainly, but they tend to interact)
- philosophy
again, mainly through the glasses of literary theory, but there isn't really a separation.
- art and architecture (including film and TV)
no, not much.
- psychology
I try to steer clear. Freud is unavoidable. I try to avoid Lacan, and I dread reading Kristeva. And apart from that, my interaction with psychology is accidental.
- literary criticism
It is unavoidable, and really rather delicious.
3. What is your favorite work of non-fiction (please exclude religious/devotional works from this question)?
You want me to choose? That is harsh.
I rarely reread anything except literary theory.
Derrida's Of Grammatology should be read more than it is. But so should Smoot's Wrinkles in Time. Barthes' S/Z and Mythologies. Oh, dear, you got me started. See, now I have mentioned some, there are others I don't feel I can leave out. Gah. No. Hmmm. Among those I have read lately, I'd say Conan Doyle's Letters are good. Hmm. I wrote a blog about that I English. Perhaps I should copy-past it here. It would function as a kind of review, I suppose. Feynman is good too. Stopping now.
4. Would you be interested in reviews of non-fiction books on this site?
Yes. I intend to provide some.
5. Have you read any non-fiction book recently that was terrible? If so, what?
I try to steer clear of those I don't think I'll like. I wasn't entirely happy with Antonia Fraser's book on Mary Stuart. It was a bit "ooh, look how womanly and female she is in her strength and femininity". And I consider myself a feminist. I did enjoy her book on the Gunpowder Plot, though.
6. Was there a non-fiction book that you read that changed the way you thought or felt about world issues (again, please exclude religious and devotional works from this question) ?
I had a really rather big epiphany when I first read S/Z. It was right at the beginning of my literature student days.
7. Do you consider books about the occult to be non-fiction or fiction? Why?
Depends on the book, I suppose.
8. In your personal library at home, what percentage of your books are non-fiction?
I have no idea. But of those I have put up on LibraryThing, there are 209 out of 840.
That's it...for now.
I like.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Non-Fiction survey
14/09/2009 05:38:04 PM
- 1152 Views
Heh.
14/09/2009 05:58:59 PM
- 837 Views
You associate non-fiction with work? Are you a non-fiction book reviewer by day?
14/09/2009 06:35:59 PM
- 659 Views
I like non-fiction as long as it's not preachy.
14/09/2009 06:25:42 PM
- 848 Views
Fun.
14/09/2009 06:31:28 PM
- 932 Views
Machiavelli is a good case study for translation vs. original language
14/09/2009 06:48:46 PM
- 691 Views
Fact not fiction.
14/09/2009 06:43:32 PM
- 875 Views
I loved Radzinsky's Rasputin bio
14/09/2009 06:58:46 PM
- 754 Views
Re: I loved Radzinsky's Rasputin bio
14/09/2009 07:10:01 PM
- 776 Views
You're going to force me to start a Dan Brown discussion in a different thread.
14/09/2009 09:00:32 PM
- 690 Views
Well, I can do it here, no worries, just think of it as non-non-fiction.
14/09/2009 09:06:34 PM
- 748 Views
Re: Fact not fiction.
17/09/2009 12:40:31 AM
- 793 Views
Re: Non-Fiction survey
14/09/2009 07:25:20 PM
- 682 Views
I do read sometimes.
14/09/2009 08:01:03 PM
- 882 Views
I read it quite a lot, obviously.
14/09/2009 09:20:40 PM
- 773 Views
Re: Non-Fiction survey
14/09/2009 09:24:35 PM
- 887 Views
I'd be interested to know the title of that Lincoln book. *NM*
15/09/2009 05:11:14 AM
- 338 Views
Re: Non-Fiction survey
14/09/2009 10:05:56 PM
- 681 Views
I'm sorry. I just can't take "pro wrestling" seriously enough to comment on it beyond this. *NM*
15/09/2009 05:15:13 AM
- 327 Views
Sweet
14/09/2009 10:09:21 PM
- 844 Views
My problem with Fisk is his naivete
15/09/2009 05:10:00 AM
- 732 Views
If you're referring to the passages I think you're referring to...
15/09/2009 11:06:04 AM
- 834 Views
Good survey!
14/09/2009 11:40:58 PM
- 828 Views
Ah...but where do you draw the line on the occult?
15/09/2009 05:07:14 AM
- 671 Views
Re: Non-Fiction survey
15/09/2009 12:25:57 AM
- 723 Views
I read a lot of it for my classes, so I read very little of it for leisure.
15/09/2009 12:46:23 AM
- 769 Views
As someone who read Ab Urbe Condita in Latin...the book you reference "delenda est".
15/09/2009 05:04:05 AM
- 701 Views
Interesting questions!
15/09/2009 07:20:05 AM
- 843 Views
Re: Non-Fiction survey
15/09/2009 11:35:48 AM
- 936 Views
Try reading something new you think you'd like and post a review! *NM*
17/09/2009 03:11:47 PM
- 294 Views
i like non-fiction!
15/09/2009 09:40:40 PM
- 771 Views
Lots of people have recommended The Omnivore's Dilemma to me *NM*
17/09/2009 03:14:09 PM
- 342 Views