Active Users:1151 Time:22/11/2024 02:29:29 PM
Re: Hmm Camilla Send a noteboard - 28/09/2010 04:41:16 PM
I've never read any of it, but I will say this:

conflating homosexuality and bisexuality with incest is problematic.

I don't think I was lumping them together in any way, though. It's only problematic if you're an a-hole. (Man, we have a different vocab. I think this is the first time I saw the word "conflate" ).


How is it only problematic if you are an a-hole?

Also, once you get to shared great-grandfathers most people will not think twice. I think.

The quote makes it plain that most supernatural beings are more lenient towards incest than those who aren't supernatural. That's odd, because there's no explanation why it should be so.


Hmm. Perhaps they cannot breed? I have no idea how things work in that world.

And I am a prude. Really.

And I'm fine with that.

The rest I cannot really comment on, having neither read the books nor seen the series (I assume this is the foundation for the True Blood series?).

Yeah, it is.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Sookie Stackhouse novels. The gay people bother me, what's up with them? - 27/09/2010 07:37:32 PM 1019 Views
Recommendation: never read the Anita Blake novels. - 27/09/2010 10:27:27 PM 874 Views
Hmm - 27/09/2010 10:58:01 PM 729 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 04:32:18 PM 760 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 04:41:16 PM 620 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 05:27:58 PM 648 Views
Re: Hmm - 28/09/2010 05:31:48 PM 680 Views
totally made up answer - 28/09/2010 09:56:07 PM 629 Views
what part of Arkansas did you say you were from? - 28/09/2010 09:48:15 PM 578 Views

Reply to Message