If quality writing is separate from the tense that is used, then the Booker should choose based on quality writing and not care about the tense whatsoever. If these authors had an issue with the actual quality of the selections, then okay, but having an issue with the fact that some of them are in present tense is ... silly.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
This just in: Philip Pullman dislikes The Present Tense.
- 14/09/2010 05:01:17 PM
1066 Views
Phillip Pullman is a silly man
- 14/09/2010 05:05:50 PM
607 Views
Re: Phillip Hensher's longer opinion piece is less emotional but still weird.
- 14/09/2010 05:17:40 PM
654 Views
I dunno, I kind of see his point.
- 14/09/2010 06:20:50 PM
589 Views
Re: I mainly find myself concerned because of the "make a stand" part.
- 14/09/2010 06:23:13 PM
588 Views
Censorship? He's hardly asking them to throw those novels out or not to select them anymore.
- 14/09/2010 06:33:14 PM
578 Views
That's silly.
- 15/09/2010 12:30:02 AM
591 Views
Well, it's like if a poetry board only picked poems written in lowercase
- 18/09/2010 08:21:36 AM
544 Views
I was amused to see that the article was written in past tense. *NM*
- 15/09/2010 06:47:31 AM
370 Views
So do I
- 22/09/2010 05:38:09 AM
594 Views
Re: So do I
- 22/09/2010 09:16:45 AM
517 Views
And on vellum. And by hand. And typically with long, boring ekphrases.
- 22/09/2010 10:03:46 AM
524 Views