Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
Macharius Send a noteboard - 24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
On reflection, I think the main source of complaints about TtH and EriKson could be dealt with by better editing, rather than trying to change the writing itself.
This message last edited by Macharius on 24/08/2010 at 07:16:48 PM
The Way of Kings - Brief Review
24/08/2010 12:54:39 AM
- 1446 Views
As someone who could not finish Misborn through multiple tries I have to say...
24/08/2010 02:57:01 AM
- 795 Views
I didn't quite have such a positive reaction to the book
24/08/2010 04:55:04 AM
- 868 Views
You know...
24/08/2010 02:07:04 PM
- 784 Views
Re: You know...
24/08/2010 02:46:16 PM
- 939 Views
Okay, that makes better sense.
24/08/2010 05:07:56 PM
- 730 Views
Well, you've seen the books I tend to read and those are unusual in regards to dialogue quality
24/08/2010 05:22:10 PM
- 832 Views

The only Sanderson I've read is Elantris
24/08/2010 11:56:28 AM
- 789 Views
Elantris is a very poor example of Sanderson's work.
24/08/2010 01:59:05 PM
- 771 Views
A very good review, and thank you.
24/08/2010 02:01:05 PM
- 729 Views
My WoK reaction
24/08/2010 03:14:58 PM
- 878 Views
I call bullshit on the Erickson comments!
24/08/2010 03:34:20 PM
- 799 Views

Yes there is a very big difference between the two...
24/08/2010 04:58:55 PM
- 701 Views
And I think that books 5, 6, and 8 are among Erikson's better novels
24/08/2010 05:06:43 PM
- 746 Views
Yes, I wondered why you stopped doing those... you've only posted up to HoC, I believe.
24/08/2010 05:22:17 PM
- 707 Views
Funny, I'd had TtH in mind when referencing Erikson.
24/08/2010 05:40:12 PM
- 704 Views