Hmmm. I don't know. At some point you'd have to draw the line, I suppose. Critical mass and all that. But since I am not a "monogamous" (really must find a better word) reader, I don't really care how long the book is. I don't have to put all other books aside while I read it, so I don't see that it matters how long it would take to finish it.
Just some suggestions 

monolectic?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Books that take a long time to read.
03/08/2010 08:21:42 AM
- 1094 Views
I'm gonna hope that was an exaggeration for comic effect...
03/08/2010 08:37:21 AM
- 796 Views

It's all looking up vocabulary. It should pick up. *NM*
03/08/2010 06:06:03 PM
- 310 Views
Re: I'm gonna hope that was an exaggeration for comic effect...
04/08/2010 11:52:01 AM
- 778 Views

Since I chose the same book to learn Spanish, some reasons.
04/08/2010 12:20:22 PM
- 673 Views
Exactly this. Though I don't know it nearly by heart.
*NM*
06/08/2010 06:56:34 AM
- 290 Views

Re: Books that take a long time to read.
03/08/2010 08:58:55 AM
- 807 Views
monobiblic? unilibric?
03/08/2010 05:18:35 PM
- 643 Views
Re: monobiblic? unilibric?
03/08/2010 05:20:04 PM
- 687 Views
The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon
03/08/2010 10:27:58 AM
- 631 Views
The unabridged Zohar in 23 volumes probably ranks up there.
03/08/2010 07:15:43 PM
- 891 Views
I'm reading The Lord of the Rings in French. Slowly. *NM*
03/08/2010 10:57:04 PM
- 263 Views
Why?
04/08/2010 02:14:44 PM
- 645 Views
Camilla's post above pretty much encapsulates it; I want to practice my French with something I know *NM*
06/08/2010 06:55:02 AM
- 303 Views
The Sound and the Fury
04/08/2010 02:51:40 PM
- 580 Views