The Silmarillion as it was published is very, very different from the pre-Hobbit writings that Tolkien had made, which are largely seen in Books I-III of the History of Middle Earth (Book of Lost Tales I and II and Lays of Beleriand). Calling that "The Silmarillion" is highly misleading at best.
As for the timing, the fact that Guy Gavriel Kay came in and helped finish the book explains how it came out quickly. After all, Brandon Sanderson got a book out pretty quickly after Robert Jordan's death.
Even looking at the later version of the Silmarillion published in the History of Middle Earth Series as Books XI and XII, it is clear that there was substantial editing by Kay and Christopher Tolkien.
As a result, I think the Silmarillion should be discounted (at least in its published form) as "Tolkien". It's "Tolkien plus his son Christopher plus Guy Gavriel Kay".
As for the timing, the fact that Guy Gavriel Kay came in and helped finish the book explains how it came out quickly. After all, Brandon Sanderson got a book out pretty quickly after Robert Jordan's death.
Even looking at the later version of the Silmarillion published in the History of Middle Earth Series as Books XI and XII, it is clear that there was substantial editing by Kay and Christopher Tolkien.
As a result, I think the Silmarillion should be discounted (at least in its published form) as "Tolkien". It's "Tolkien plus his son Christopher plus Guy Gavriel Kay".
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Tolkien as a sacred cow of fantasy
- 28/07/2010 10:02:39 PM
1647 Views
Nonsense, at least in part
- 28/07/2010 10:19:19 PM
1213 Views
I know there is a polite difference of opinion here
- 28/07/2010 10:40:42 PM
1023 Views
Have to agree.
- 28/07/2010 11:38:37 PM
1117 Views
It seemed to be that way with Harry Potter just when after it had started to get big.
- 29/07/2010 09:44:53 AM
940 Views
*cough* Twilight *cough*
- 29/07/2010 10:15:13 AM
976 Views
I was gonna mention that one too.
- 29/07/2010 10:35:17 AM
1051 Views
Mmm. I read an interesting article actually...
- 29/07/2010 08:24:04 PM
872 Views
That's a fair point, I guess...
- 29/07/2010 09:18:13 PM
1082 Views
mmm, except it's relevant to Bella too.
- 29/07/2010 10:43:03 PM
954 Views
That's my point, it's pretty much only relevant to Bella - only there is it shown prominently. *NM*
- 29/07/2010 10:59:54 PM
478 Views
Of course, since she's the main character, it matters rather a lot, yes? *NM*
- 30/07/2010 09:39:07 AM
468 Views
How much do you have to read to form an opinion?
- 29/07/2010 12:23:28 PM
1029 Views
To the end
- 29/07/2010 12:59:25 PM
901 Views
my reading time is too scarce to think that way
- 29/07/2010 01:21:26 PM
1106 Views
I agree, but HP is a good example of something you should keep reading
- 29/07/2010 08:27:20 PM
1078 Views
and I will
- 29/07/2010 09:13:03 PM
807 Views
The books mature as Harry does. You should really give it another shot *NM*
- 29/07/2010 03:00:37 PM
539 Views
He doesn't want to, so why should he? It's not like you or he is losing anything now
- 29/07/2010 06:15:58 PM
893 Views
It is a case of the "someone is wrong on the internet" thing, only much older
- 29/07/2010 06:27:07 PM
852 Views
well you have not failed completely
- 29/07/2010 06:50:15 PM
848 Views
Re: well you have not failed completely
- 29/07/2010 06:53:38 PM
896 Views
one quick question
- 29/07/2010 07:38:00 PM
937 Views
how many books do I have to read to get to the grown up books?
- 29/07/2010 06:42:37 PM
877 Views
None of them are "geared towards grown ups" - it's still a YA series.
- 29/07/2010 07:03:24 PM
864 Views
They're all "light reading" for adults, geared towards YA readers.
- 29/07/2010 08:29:01 PM
854 Views
Re: It seemed to be that way with Harry Potter just when after it had started to get big.
- 29/07/2010 08:45:58 PM
987 Views
it's not supposed to be on par with adult fantasy.
- 29/07/2010 08:49:16 PM
971 Views
I'd argue it's better than Jordan and others from a literary standpoint.
- 29/07/2010 09:14:07 PM
926 Views
I have always thought Jordan had some interesting themes but they were often ignored...
- 29/07/2010 09:27:12 PM
1070 Views
I agree Tolkien should not be a sacred cow or put on a pedestal overmuch.
- 28/07/2010 11:10:37 PM
1040 Views
I completely agree that there should be no sacred cows, and that applies to Tolkien.
- 28/07/2010 11:13:39 PM
953 Views
all art forms have sacred cows
- 29/07/2010 01:38:26 AM
1057 Views
Yeah, it was the line about women waiting at home while their men went to war that made me laugh.
- 29/07/2010 06:44:34 PM
947 Views
Disappointing.
- 29/07/2010 04:41:34 AM
1009 Views
I think you are ignoring the key fact that the Silmarillion was never published by Tolkien.
- 30/07/2010 01:48:14 PM
1253 Views
The Silmarillion was actually one of Tolkien's first works
- 30/07/2010 06:12:31 PM
1332 Views
No it wasn't.
- 30/07/2010 06:37:19 PM
981 Views
I find the Tolkien lovers to be obnoxious in their never ending masturbatory praise of his works.
- 30/07/2010 06:09:42 AM
1011 Views