Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/07/2010 10:32:55 AM
So before reading Tower of Babel I really should read the two preceeding books in the series?
Hm. It's not really necessary, the books stand alone enough that you can read any book in the series without having read the rest - I did, started with Babel Tower. But if you're intending to read all four, obviously reading them in order would probably be better. Not so much for spoilers - I didn't think my knowing some things beforehand ruined my appreciation of the second book - but because that way the evolution of Frederica's character and those of some other characters will make more sense. It's a bit confusing if you read out of order as I'm doing. And I suppose reading a book while waiting all the time for certain things to happen, because you've read the sequel, does change the way you read things. If you know from the start that something that seems to be going well will end in drama, or conversely that something apparently heading for drama will end well, it probably doesn't impact you the same way when the change occurs.
Oooh. That sounds very nice. All of them, actually, but I was thinking of the Tennyson one. It would be interesting to compare how her treatment of a real author compares to her treatment of a fictional one.
Well, the focus is more on Tennyson's friend for whom he wrote that early mourning poem than on himself, but still.
/Other Liteature: Possession by A.S. Byatt
06/07/2010 06:02:40 PM
- 5264 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession.
06/07/2010 06:43:34 PM
- 1624 Views
I'm sure I did too.
06/07/2010 07:00:06 PM
- 1523 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too.
07/07/2010 12:05:16 AM
- 1479 Views
The main reason for my love of the book are the letters, I would say.
24/07/2010 10:00:13 PM
- 1450 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession.
07/07/2010 12:04:03 AM
- 1560 Views
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story.
07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM
- 1466 Views
Re: Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story.
09/07/2010 11:45:45 AM
- 1450 Views
It's funny. I'd have to reread, but based on what I remember I have the opposite view.
24/07/2010 10:06:57 PM
- 1448 Views
It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine.
24/07/2010 10:42:39 PM
- 1553 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine.
25/07/2010 09:09:50 AM
- 1441 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine.
25/07/2010 10:32:55 AM
- 1446 Views