Active Users:1007 Time:21/11/2024 05:28:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla Send a noteboard - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM
I think she has old-age selective memory.

I must have formed the impression of what it was about from one of you. Unless Legolas is the culprit. There are a limited number of people who have been telling me to read it.

I'm more likely to have told you it was about who owns literary works after their author is dead, and if the public gets to own the works then does that mean we get to own the author's lives as well? And about literary criticism, etc. Against the backdrop of relationships.

I'm pretty sure I've never mentioned Roland & Maud's relationship because I don't like it. :P


No, it does feel a little ... off. Then again, everyone in this book is dysfunctional. That is another thing I have come to expect from Byatt. The only normal person in this book is Lady Bailey.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
/Other Liteature: Possession by A.S. Byatt Camilla - 06/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 5266 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. Danae al'Thor - 06/07/2010 06:43:34 PM 1624 Views
I'm sure I did too. Rebekah - 06/07/2010 07:00:06 PM 1524 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla - 07/07/2010 12:05:16 AM 1479 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Rebekah - 07/07/2010 08:32:29 AM 1459 Views
Re: I'm sure I did too. Camilla - 07/07/2010 09:04:15 AM 1528 Views
Hm. Rebekah - 10/07/2010 12:55:20 AM 1438 Views
The main reason for my love of the book are the letters, I would say. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:00:13 PM 1450 Views
Re: Excuse me. I have a very clear recollection of writing to you about Possession. Camilla - 07/07/2010 12:04:03 AM 1561 Views
Re: No no. I talked about Danae al'Thor - 07/07/2010 12:49:30 AM 1437 Views
Re: No no. I talked about Camilla - 07/07/2010 09:01:28 AM 1698 Views
Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Tim - 07/07/2010 10:34:12 AM 1467 Views
Re: Yes, I saw it more as a criticism (satire?) of obsessive academia than a love-story. Camilla - 09/07/2010 11:45:45 AM 1450 Views
It's funny. I'd have to reread, but based on what I remember I have the opposite view. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:06:57 PM 1449 Views
Coincidentally, it was also a digested read in the Guardian. Camilla - 09/07/2010 03:48:09 PM 1679 Views
Meh.... Milla - 09/07/2010 07:54:12 PM 1620 Views
Awww. Rebekah - 10/07/2010 12:54:44 AM 1464 Views
Re: Awww. Milla - 10/07/2010 07:14:37 PM 1661 Views
Re: Meh.... Camilla - 10/07/2010 11:24:43 AM 1475 Views
Re: Meh.... Milla - 10/07/2010 07:15:29 PM 1568 Views
It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Legolas - 24/07/2010 10:42:39 PM 1553 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Camilla - 25/07/2010 09:09:50 AM 1441 Views
Re: It's a sign of it being a good book that you can like it for such different reasons from mine. Legolas - 25/07/2010 10:32:55 AM 1446 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes