I highly recommend the Merchant of Venice (2004) directed by Michael Radford
everynametaken Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 03:28:19 AM
I had to watch it in conjunction with reading the play for a class I had in Shakespeare last summer. It was a very good adaptation and almost all of the play material was in it in actual verse rather than edited and chopped up drastically like plays sometimes get.
Jeremy Irons played a very good Antonio and Joseph Fiennes was a superb Bassanio. Lynn Collins as Portia and Kris Marshall as Gratiano were also excellent casting choices. And Al frigging Pacino as Shylock was like a cherry on the top. Seriously. When I first saw Al Pacino in it I thought, "Come on, all that guy can play is a tough NYC cop or a gangster." I was extremely surprised at the flavor and life he brought to the character of Shylock.
The camera work was top notch, the screenplay was written extremely well and the interaction between characters was superb; each embodied their given role (supporting cast included) to the utmost and put on one hell of a performance.
I also watched Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet (196 and his Hamlet (1990) for the class. Both were good but each also had a lot of editing done so they didn't follow the play as closely as the Merchant of Venice did.
Jeremy Irons played a very good Antonio and Joseph Fiennes was a superb Bassanio. Lynn Collins as Portia and Kris Marshall as Gratiano were also excellent casting choices. And Al frigging Pacino as Shylock was like a cherry on the top. Seriously. When I first saw Al Pacino in it I thought, "Come on, all that guy can play is a tough NYC cop or a gangster." I was extremely surprised at the flavor and life he brought to the character of Shylock.
The camera work was top notch, the screenplay was written extremely well and the interaction between characters was superb; each embodied their given role (supporting cast included) to the utmost and put on one hell of a performance.
I also watched Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet (196 and his Hamlet (1990) for the class. Both were good but each also had a lot of editing done so they didn't follow the play as closely as the Merchant of Venice did.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
This message last edited by everynametaken on 04/06/2010 at 03:29:41 AM
Book to Film adaptations - a few discussion questions.
03/06/2010 07:00:12 PM
- 926 Views
well
03/06/2010 09:35:41 PM
- 710 Views
Re: well
03/06/2010 11:43:46 PM
- 653 Views
Re: Book to Film adaptations - a few discussion questions.
03/06/2010 09:49:47 PM
- 703 Views
I highly recommend the Merchant of Venice (2004) directed by Michael Radford
04/06/2010 03:28:19 AM
- 656 Views
After finishing a book I never really think "gosh that would make a good film"
04/06/2010 01:35:19 PM
- 790 Views
I do sometimes. Mostly with thrillers or the like.
05/06/2010 04:13:27 PM
- 740 Views
Luhrman largely stuck to Shakespeare's dialogue, though... and that worked amazingly well imho. *NM*
05/06/2010 04:25:08 PM
- 358 Views
Re: Book to Film adaptations - a few discussion questions.
04/06/2010 03:27:55 PM
- 694 Views
Re: Book to Film adaptations - a few discussion questions.
04/06/2010 03:57:53 PM
- 637 Views
I would disagree
04/06/2010 04:09:23 PM
- 662 Views
Re: I would disagree
04/06/2010 04:11:18 PM
- 672 Views
Quite the opposite
04/06/2010 04:18:33 PM
- 649 Views
The more I think about it
04/06/2010 06:22:25 PM
- 644 Views
some people expect the movies to be to true the book
04/06/2010 08:14:30 PM
- 606 Views