With that much money, I could buy myself and my family some sweet ass stuff and still have plenty to help a lot of other people. What's the point in owning these "original" books and paying so much money for them? Every iota of information contained therein has already been reprinted or stored in a variety of media. We're not living in the past here. Books are not holy. They're not some sacred relic. Books are cheap and beyond plentiful. All they contain is easily accessible to anyone who wants to access it. I like to read as much as anyone, but they're just books. I've noticed that those who are most wedded to the actual printed books are the most likely to be orgasmic over this collection of books. They'll never have time to read them, even if they read them. I'm sure they'd just stick them in a case and drool over them. Then they become nothing more than objects of a collection and not at all the conveyors of knowledge that the book-fetishists claim is the reason they hold books in such high regard.
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
-Samantha Jones, SatC
This message last edited by LiterateDog on 02/06/2010 at 06:54:14 AM
So, um, I need £15 million...
01/06/2010 11:11:20 PM
- 945 Views
I don't understand this fetishization of bound, printed matter.
02/06/2010 12:04:08 AM
- 645 Views
Yeah... I'd rather have £15 million in ebooks. Or, you know, other things than books. *NM*
02/06/2010 05:28:03 AM
- 267 Views
Not books at all, printed or e-formatted.
02/06/2010 06:27:50 AM
- 727 Views
Did you read the last part of the article?
02/06/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 672 Views
i would love to have a first edition printing of the hobbit actually
03/06/2010 05:09:34 AM
- 859 Views
Surely you could designate a thousand or two for literary pursuits! I agree with you, though. *NM*
03/06/2010 01:36:48 AM
- 255 Views
Then I take it you wouldn't bid against me. If only all were like you. *NM*
02/06/2010 09:21:48 AM
- 353 Views