Active Users:316 Time:09/04/2025 04:45:29 AM
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. DomA Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 10:51:10 PM
I have to say I enjoyed CoT a lot more on my last reread, but one of the most enjoyable books in the series... no, sorry. :P


The thing about me and Jordan is that I'm not really reading him for the big epic quest (and the "epicness" in the early books actually annoyed me more than anything). I know where it's going, and details aside, I know how it ends. I'm not bothered by the fact the "main story" has slowed down, or that Jordan went into so much details about the Andoran succession, or the Tower conflict, nor even that Faile doesn't get rescued fast, or that Tuon and Mat are just on the road. There's a lot happening in COT, it's just not obviously relevant to the main storyline. It's also a book about things getting bogged down and stalled while time is running out, so it's pretty normal there's a feeling of stagnation in some place. Jordan sought to create that effect. Arguably, he overdid it :D

It's also not as interesting to a lot of readers, and I understand that - whereas it deals with stuff I personally find enjoyable, and I find Jordan on the whole far more interesting in detailed, slow storylines than he is when he tries to be fast-paced and epic (he's not all that good with that, IMO), so... that's why I prefer the later books (from POD, say) to the earlier ones (though my favourite is book 4, in part because it's then I knew I wished to continue reading).

It's more that you just don't care as much anymore, because it doesn't seem like the series is really going anywhere - new characters keep coming, old characters keep dying, and no later book comes close to the levels of MoI. Sure, you keep having to figure out things, and you keep learning more details about earlier books (if you want to know more about that dragon Silanah in Gardens of the Moon, you'll see her in book eight, for instance), but I don't know, personally I kind of want there to be a point to things, and to have the series end in some satisfactory way that provides at least some kind of closure for at least most plot threads. I still have to read the final two books, but it doesn't look to me like that's going to happen.


Well... that may be a plus for me, but only as long as Erikson manages to keep me interested in his world.

I read big series with a main storyline that seem to "go somewhere" mostly because it's what is available, and I like big series. I guess I'm more interested in imaginary worlds than in traditional epic fantasy as such. I loved Miéville's Bas Lag for its lack of that (but I would gladly have read 4-5 more BL stand-alones).
Reply to message
Steven Erikson and Ian Cameron Esslemont, Malazan Book of the Fallen (series reviews) - 17/05/2010 01:09:47 PM 1374 Views
Gardens of the Moon (2002-2005 re-reads; 2010 re-read) - 17/05/2010 01:10:14 PM 985 Views
I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 17/05/2010 01:32:28 PM 844 Views
Legolas - 17/05/2010 07:17:38 PM 815 Views
I wonder as well - 18/05/2010 07:12:23 PM 829 Views
Re: I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 19/05/2010 02:12:42 PM 743 Views
MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 12:29:22 PM 684 Views
Re: MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 03:39:10 PM 792 Views
Agreed. - 21/05/2010 03:43:56 PM 801 Views
That’s one of the things I like about MT more than DG - 22/05/2010 11:57:32 AM 703 Views
Larry - 17/05/2010 07:19:16 PM 813 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 18/05/2010 07:12:46 PM 327 Views
For me, GotM remains a half-failure - 22/05/2010 06:05:30 PM 983 Views
I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 22/05/2010 07:32:25 PM 795 Views
Re: I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 23/05/2010 10:32:49 PM 893 Views
Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 04:20:35 PM 760 Views
Re: Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 10:57:00 PM 860 Views
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM 856 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 02:11:01 PM 786 Views
I'm waiting for the paperback. - 28/05/2010 08:44:47 PM 763 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 10:51:10 PM 876 Views
It's not my cup of tea. Good luck reading it! - 19/05/2010 03:42:08 PM 890 Views
I've got to ask. - 20/05/2010 08:56:14 PM 765 Views
I agree with Kotagg - 21/05/2010 01:52:06 PM 748 Views
I thought it was very standard fare. - 21/05/2010 10:49:41 PM 844 Views
Deadhouse Gates (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 21/05/2010 06:13:47 PM 842 Views
You left out the most important part! - 21/05/2010 06:45:58 PM 899 Views
Some things I leave until latter novels - 21/05/2010 06:54:36 PM 877 Views
I find myself... - 06/06/2010 03:21:07 AM 933 Views
From what I recall, yes - 06/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 757 Views
It makes sense. Thanks - 14/06/2010 11:57:08 PM 914 Views
Memories of Ice (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 27/05/2010 08:47:02 AM 848 Views
As I posted in your blog RE: Themes. - 27/05/2010 05:25:19 PM 885 Views
House of Chains (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 01/06/2010 06:17:01 AM 894 Views

Reply to Message