Active Users:315 Time:09/04/2025 04:45:27 AM
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. Legolas Send a noteboard - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM
Yeah, I thought so too. That happens when I write answers late in the evening :) I meant to chop it down to a few things the next morning, but I forgot and it post instead.

I see. ;)
That will probably depend how much he manages to draw my interest along the way. If he really hooks me, then I might very well enjoy his slower, not very eventful books (if I recall, one of those you speak of has been dubbed Erikson's CoT by some). As it happens, in complex series with tons of details and great worldbuilding, I'm usually the type who prefers the later books to the earliest books. To me, COT is one of the more enjoyable books in WOT, by far superior as I judge such things to anything published before LOC. And my favourite Dune was always Chapterhouse. My "road block" in WOT have always been EOTW and TGH, and with anything before Aragorn in LOTR, and so on. I'm not a reader who likes beginnings all that much!

I have to say I enjoyed CoT a lot more on my last reread, but one of the most enjoyable books in the series... no, sorry. :P

It doesn't really compare, though, because the problem is not that nothing happens in the later books. Every single Malazan book has the same pattern of relatively slow movement in the first half of the book (in some cases it's really slow, in others merely slow compared to the second half), and then the big "convergence" in the second half - he even has a plot justification for it, with the whole thing of Ascendants flocking to every convergence they see occurring in their vicinity and making the chaos bigger.

It's more that you just don't care as much anymore, because it doesn't seem like the series is really going anywhere - new characters keep coming, old characters keep dying, and no later book comes close to the levels of MoI. Sure, you keep having to figure out things, and you keep learning more details about earlier books (if you want to know more about that dragon Silanah in Gardens of the Moon, you'll see her in book eight, for instance), but I don't know, personally I kind of want there to be a point to things, and to have the series end in some satisfactory way that provides at least some kind of closure for at least most plot threads. I still have to read the final two books, but it doesn't look to me like that's going to happen.

I would probably have to reread books six, seven and eight before making this kind of judgements, but if you asked me now, I'd have to say both Reaper's Gale and Toll the Hounds were among my least favourite books in the series - despite being among the most spectacular in terms of plot events. Toll the Hounds has a truly massive, game-changing thing happening in its climax, but I still didn't like the book much. Bonehunters was more fun, but felt somewhat fluffy in the sense that little of it seemed to matter all that much in the greater scheme of things.
And speaking of road blocks, I've beat my record and finished GOTM in under two weeks for the first time (past record was maybe 2 months). Now I'm 300 pages into DHG a day later and having fun. Hopefully, I will get to those books 7-8 through the summer.

Good job! :P
Reply to message
Steven Erikson and Ian Cameron Esslemont, Malazan Book of the Fallen (series reviews) - 17/05/2010 01:09:47 PM 1374 Views
Gardens of the Moon (2002-2005 re-reads; 2010 re-read) - 17/05/2010 01:10:14 PM 985 Views
I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 17/05/2010 01:32:28 PM 844 Views
Legolas - 17/05/2010 07:17:38 PM 815 Views
I wonder as well - 18/05/2010 07:12:23 PM 829 Views
Re: I have the same experience with rereads of Erikson always bringing new things to the fore. - 19/05/2010 02:12:42 PM 743 Views
MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 12:29:22 PM 684 Views
Re: MT was just as good as those two, IMHO of course. - 21/05/2010 03:39:10 PM 792 Views
Agreed. - 21/05/2010 03:43:56 PM 801 Views
That’s one of the things I like about MT more than DG - 22/05/2010 11:57:32 AM 703 Views
Larry - 17/05/2010 07:19:16 PM 813 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 18/05/2010 07:12:46 PM 327 Views
For me, GotM remains a half-failure - 22/05/2010 06:05:30 PM 983 Views
I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 22/05/2010 07:32:25 PM 795 Views
Re: I think even most fans of the series will agree with you there. - 23/05/2010 10:32:49 PM 892 Views
Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 04:20:35 PM 760 Views
Re: Ye gods, that reply was long. - 27/05/2010 10:57:00 PM 859 Views
Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 08:56:48 AM 856 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 02:11:01 PM 786 Views
I'm waiting for the paperback. - 28/05/2010 08:44:47 PM 763 Views
Re: Oh, it's not about a lack of action. - 28/05/2010 10:51:10 PM 875 Views
It's not my cup of tea. Good luck reading it! - 19/05/2010 03:42:08 PM 890 Views
I've got to ask. - 20/05/2010 08:56:14 PM 765 Views
I agree with Kotagg - 21/05/2010 01:52:06 PM 748 Views
I thought it was very standard fare. - 21/05/2010 10:49:41 PM 844 Views
Deadhouse Gates (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 21/05/2010 06:13:47 PM 842 Views
You left out the most important part! - 21/05/2010 06:45:58 PM 899 Views
Some things I leave until latter novels - 21/05/2010 06:54:36 PM 877 Views
I find myself... - 06/06/2010 03:21:07 AM 933 Views
From what I recall, yes - 06/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 757 Views
It makes sense. Thanks - 14/06/2010 11:57:08 PM 914 Views
Memories of Ice (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 27/05/2010 08:47:02 AM 848 Views
As I posted in your blog RE: Themes. - 27/05/2010 05:25:19 PM 885 Views
House of Chains (2002-2005 reads; 2010 re-read) - 01/06/2010 06:17:01 AM 894 Views

Reply to Message