Generally any work is better in the original media it was intended for. There are always exceptions to the rule though... I just can't think of any off hand
2001 is sort of one, if I'm remembering correctly it was a joint film and book.
2001 is sort of one, if I'm remembering correctly it was a joint film and book.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Film to book adaptations.
27/05/2010 11:48:53 AM
- 933 Views
I think it is a similar rule
27/05/2010 12:15:07 PM
- 668 Views
Re: I think it is a similar rule
27/05/2010 12:29:30 PM
- 712 Views
I guess in theory they can be good but all the onesI have read sucked
27/05/2010 05:43:55 PM
- 598 Views
I kind of feel like a film to book adaption is not....really a book?
27/05/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 929 Views
I read The Phantom Menace by Terry Brooks.
27/05/2010 09:22:30 PM
- 626 Views
Same here.
28/05/2010 12:53:28 AM
- 709 Views
Ask a ten year old how he likes the film *NM*
28/05/2010 08:25:22 AM
- 311 Views
Exactly. I loved the film so much I freaked out when I saw the book in a Motel giftstore.
29/05/2010 03:22:45 AM
- 705 Views
I think Ladyhawke by Joan D. Vinge is one. Haven't read it yet. *NM*
27/05/2010 11:18:43 PM
- 325 Views