On identity and communication: do we love only ourselves?
Tom Send a noteboard - 25/04/2010 03:35:34 PM
To me, one of the most interesting questions that Solaris posed was to what extent everything we think we know is filtered through our own prism of how we perceive reality. It isn't a particularly new or revolutionary concept, but what Lem did was to show extremely well how we tend to do that. It's one thing to recognize it in the abstract, it's another thing to see its direct consequences.
This is one of those times when I think the "alienating" effect of a science fiction setting helps make the point of the story. Ultimately, the book seems to be saying we are born, live and die alone, and we think we're communicating with other people but the communication is always flawed because we impose our own ideas on everything.
Harey (I'm going to use the Polish spelling, as I understand it, for names) killed herself and is gone. The Harey that shows up on the station is the Harey of his memories. This Harey is flawed because she is (by her own admission, even) not acting as she really did, but has Kris has selectively remembered. He chose to remember certain things about her and ignore others. He did so because he wanted to make her adhere more to certain ideas he had about who she should be - who she should be as a woman, as a lover, as a friend, etc. He may have subconsciously ignored things about her in order to make the "emotional connection" possible. The real Harey likely did the same thing, but the faux Harey on the station may not be doing that.
We don't even know what that Harey is. Is she a result of natural phenomena on Solaris? Is Solaris alive and interacting by pretending to be her? We don't know. Kris is forced to confront the idea that he has projected upon Harey what he wanted to. Does this mean he loved the idea of Harey that he built up in his mind and not the "real" Harey back on Earth? The realization seems to break the dangerous nostalgia that he fell into by allowing the proximity of the faux Harey.
The other question is: is the faux Harey real? Is she self-conscious? We don't know. We only know what we hear her say, but we're not sure if her emotions, thoughts, ideas, words, etc. are the result of a sentient Solaris, or the result of an independent, sentient being that was generated, or the result of Kris's own thoughts somehow taking form.
Either way, it is clear that all of the scientists are dealing with very difficult memories. It could simply be that, by virtue of suppressing the painful memories in order to be able to live and experience joy, those memories have become the strongest "signal" for Solaris to pick up (if that's what it's doing - either as a sentient entity or as a chemical or physical reaction).
Thoughts?
This is one of those times when I think the "alienating" effect of a science fiction setting helps make the point of the story. Ultimately, the book seems to be saying we are born, live and die alone, and we think we're communicating with other people but the communication is always flawed because we impose our own ideas on everything.
Harey (I'm going to use the Polish spelling, as I understand it, for names) killed herself and is gone. The Harey that shows up on the station is the Harey of his memories. This Harey is flawed because she is (by her own admission, even) not acting as she really did, but has Kris has selectively remembered. He chose to remember certain things about her and ignore others. He did so because he wanted to make her adhere more to certain ideas he had about who she should be - who she should be as a woman, as a lover, as a friend, etc. He may have subconsciously ignored things about her in order to make the "emotional connection" possible. The real Harey likely did the same thing, but the faux Harey on the station may not be doing that.
We don't even know what that Harey is. Is she a result of natural phenomena on Solaris? Is Solaris alive and interacting by pretending to be her? We don't know. Kris is forced to confront the idea that he has projected upon Harey what he wanted to. Does this mean he loved the idea of Harey that he built up in his mind and not the "real" Harey back on Earth? The realization seems to break the dangerous nostalgia that he fell into by allowing the proximity of the faux Harey.
The other question is: is the faux Harey real? Is she self-conscious? We don't know. We only know what we hear her say, but we're not sure if her emotions, thoughts, ideas, words, etc. are the result of a sentient Solaris, or the result of an independent, sentient being that was generated, or the result of Kris's own thoughts somehow taking form.
Either way, it is clear that all of the scientists are dealing with very difficult memories. It could simply be that, by virtue of suppressing the painful memories in order to be able to live and experience joy, those memories have become the strongest "signal" for Solaris to pick up (if that's what it's doing - either as a sentient entity or as a chemical or physical reaction).
Thoughts?
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Sci-Fi Book Club: SOLARIS by Stanislaw Lem
19/04/2010 05:50:45 PM
- 1892 Views
Roll-Call: Have you read it? Are you reading it? Like it: Yes/NO? *NM*
19/04/2010 05:52:00 PM
- 660 Views
I just finished it.
19/04/2010 06:54:49 PM
- 1141 Views
Yes, I read it. Must be something like... eh. it was before the clooney horror movie came out? *NM*
19/04/2010 07:23:15 PM
- 674 Views
I'm currently reading it
20/04/2010 10:00:05 AM
- 1353 Views
I am with you on that. It may not be rational or my reasons have to do with vanity
20/04/2010 11:18:53 PM
- 917 Views
Re: When you look through Lem's page on Solaris covers, that one is the least interesting.
24/04/2010 10:01:50 AM
- 1037 Views
Translation:
19/04/2010 05:54:57 PM
- 1239 Views
English translation by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox (1970).
19/04/2010 06:56:54 PM
- 1107 Views
Translation of a translation, actually. *NM*
19/04/2010 07:22:18 PM
- 599 Views
Yes, I did read Jake's intro piece there. *NM*
19/04/2010 07:23:44 PM
- 602 Views
Read a swedish translation back then.
19/04/2010 07:28:14 PM
- 1022 Views
Yes, the version I read was translated from polish. All the names were intact from the original *NM*
20/04/2010 12:17:42 AM
- 600 Views
1970 translation from French to English by Joanna Kilmartin and Steve Cox
20/04/2010 02:20:42 AM
- 1207 Views
Re: Does anyone know why the Polish publishers haven't commissioned another translation?
24/04/2010 10:04:38 AM
- 1065 Views
So. Uh. The chick's name was Rheya in the book I read. Not in other translations?
19/04/2010 07:42:16 PM
- 1082 Views
Her name in the original is Harey, it got changed to Rheya somewhere along the way of the
19/04/2010 07:49:33 PM
- 1098 Views
I haven't looked into the reasons yet, outside of what would seem obvious,
19/04/2010 09:26:11 PM
- 1122 Views
Re: I think the translators just thought Harey wasn't immediately accessible as a feminine name.
24/04/2010 09:59:17 AM
- 1179 Views
Literature vs. Genre Fiction
21/04/2010 02:33:21 PM
- 1142 Views
Re:
21/04/2010 09:09:02 PM
- 1037 Views
How do you know Solaris was an advanced intelligence?
22/04/2010 01:20:35 AM
- 969 Views
It's definitely literature
22/04/2010 01:19:34 AM
- 903 Views
You might be winning me over to your thoughts here.
26/04/2010 09:42:33 PM
- 895 Views
In all fairness to my opponents, Solaris is one of my strongest cases.
26/04/2010 10:16:20 PM
- 854 Views
As long as you realize...
26/04/2010 10:26:00 PM
- 933 Views
This is why I sort of float around on this issue.
27/04/2010 05:49:39 PM
- 981 Views
Re: This is why I sort of float around on this issue.
13/05/2010 10:15:38 AM
- 1008 Views
What didn't you enjoy?
21/04/2010 09:47:06 PM
- 909 Views
I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris.
22/04/2010 01:17:22 AM
- 881 Views
Re: I didn't like the excessive description of the types of clouds on Solaris.
23/04/2010 03:33:14 AM
- 961 Views
Re: I found it made this stark contrast with his descriptions of his own, more human environment.
24/04/2010 09:56:40 AM
- 1162 Views
So, is there really anything to discuss about the story itself?
22/04/2010 08:55:03 AM
- 1087 Views
Apparently not.
22/04/2010 01:38:24 PM
- 1136 Views
Point of fact,
23/04/2010 02:53:47 PM
- 1008 Views
Perhaps it's time for a self-reevaluation then
24/04/2010 10:45:44 AM
- 1335 Views
They never claimed to have a monopoly on guiding the discussions. I am just happy they are starting
25/04/2010 05:51:01 PM
- 968 Views
Thank you for telling me how I should prioritize my life, Larry.
26/04/2010 04:54:01 PM
- 1140 Views
At least I am not as quick to repeat the same excuses
26/04/2010 05:13:08 PM
- 1288 Views
I was originally gonna reply to your previous post, then decided not to. Guess I will now.
26/04/2010 05:42:15 PM
- 1131 Views
Well, when my sleeping is screwed up, interpretations are going to be wonky, it seems
27/04/2010 06:21:57 PM
- 1055 Views
One point...
26/04/2010 07:34:02 PM
- 980 Views
Posting while irritated and about to crash does little good, it seems
27/04/2010 06:20:19 PM
- 1056 Views
The delay to the review is my fault. I've got a mostly finished one. I'm just not happy with it.
27/04/2010 07:19:35 PM
- 1028 Views
It wasn't the review I was irritated about, but thanks for doing it
27/04/2010 07:39:08 PM
- 927 Views
I'm a bit ambivalent on the merits of this approach of yours.
26/04/2010 05:32:19 PM
- 921 Views
I am mostly just trying the approach out as something a little bit different.
26/04/2010 07:23:12 PM
- 1036 Views
Re: So what do you think about any of those things?
23/04/2010 08:30:55 PM
- 949 Views
I've posted my thoughts on most of those issues in various places in this discussion.
24/04/2010 05:02:44 AM
- 1117 Views
Re: I think I'd just like for you to be more proactive and Start A Thread.
24/04/2010 09:50:26 AM
- 1038 Views
A question about Lem.
23/04/2010 03:49:57 AM
- 1007 Views
My main thoughts on Solaris by Stanislaw Lem
23/04/2010 02:50:10 AM
- 1317 Views
I finally watched Avatar for the first time tonight.
25/04/2010 04:27:34 AM
- 938 Views
Re: I finally watched Avatar for the first time tonight.
25/04/2010 01:52:19 PM
- 986 Views
It had more to do with recognizing mankind's tendency to imposes their ideas on other cultures.
25/04/2010 05:35:25 PM
- 1027 Views
On identity and communication: do we love only ourselves?
25/04/2010 03:35:34 PM
- 987 Views
I did spend a lot of the book speculating on what the planet was trying to do with those supressed
25/04/2010 05:05:38 PM
- 1064 Views
The argument: (From the text and some thoughts)
27/04/2010 06:22:34 PM
- 920 Views
It is interesting you should say that.
12/05/2010 09:56:26 PM
- 1208 Views
That is the second time this week that I have heard something about Derrida. Now I am going to have
13/05/2010 12:02:56 AM
- 1065 Views
Is Solaris alive? Is Solaris sentient?
25/04/2010 03:40:57 PM
- 958 Views
What do you think the biggest message of the book is?
25/04/2010 03:47:03 PM
- 1021 Views
Re: Does he let go of her? How independant is she of him?
25/04/2010 04:07:33 PM
- 1063 Views
Did anyone else do any wondering what their own visitors would take the form of if they were there?
26/04/2010 11:31:27 PM
- 944 Views
Re: You know, the more I think about it, the more surprised I am everyone only seemed to have one.
10/05/2010 10:08:23 PM
- 1000 Views