More diplomacy,
They've actually been pretty darned diplomatic.
less moves such as arresting Sadr's aide (why did they do that?),
Because he was wanted for questioning based on intelligence. When it turned out that he was (at least apparently) a decent guy they let him go. No biggie there.
more transparency and urgency in the handover of power and institutions to Iraqis.
Take a look at everything they've tried to let the Iraquis run on their own. Much of it has been a disaster. Their military is far from being up to handling even a militia like Sadrs and the cops, while often brave, are a disaster organizationally and are all almost completely unskilled.
Quite simply, the Iraquis are not ready for more power. They aren't even handling well the power they have. That's the problem with ripping out a regime like the Baathists. It leaves a big power vacuum and that's what you're seeing now.
An increased international approach.
So the international community can screw this up like they've screwed up so many other places they've "intervened"? No thanks. We don't need another Rwanda or Kosovo or Somalia.
Plus (although I don't know how this is viewed by Iraqis) - not treating Iraqi reconstrcution like "spoils of war". Edit: To name a few off-hand.
I think all the Iraquis care about is getting things working again.
Not really. There may have been coordination but this offensive strategy was on American terms in the sense that they moved in on Fallujah and Sadr as a two-pronged initiative.
It is my belief that Sadr was probably largely behind the rising in Fallujah and that these are one and the same action.
Silver Warder
Warder to Rebelaessedai
Risk everything - or gain nothing.
Geoffrey de Charney - 1356
Deeds - Not words
Remembering Joe (CrazedWeasel)