Active Users:1060 Time:23/11/2024 12:25:55 PM
Back to Messageboard Search My Favourite Threads
The law of the land is determined by social values, Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 04:11:55 PM

since religion is, in part, the values of various communities, I see no legal problems if:

1) The Charter of Rights is inviolable.
2) The matter at hand is civil not criminal.

That's ridiculous. For one thing, it panders to the large religions and screws the smaller ones--what's a wiccan going to do for divorce? And I'm an atheist, do they have to have special laws for me? And there's thousands of branches of major religions, many very different--laws for each of them, too?
If you're passing a law, it should be because that law *should be there* on a national scale. Splitting it up between the major religions ain't right.

I am not certain on this myself but how can you be certian that the arbitration law pertains to Sharia alone?

This message last edited by Monotonous Mantra on 4/29/2004 at 4:23:36 PM.




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Sharia in Canada aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:51:39 PM 168 Views
Cute. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 02:57:02 PM 7 Views
That's a rather puzzling response. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:58:05 PM 5 Views
It's Snuggly legislation if I've ever seen it *NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:01:34 PM 2 Views
I skimmed thorugh the article (reading it again now) but... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:07:01 PM 18 Views
I now am registered at... Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:27:09 PM 15 Views
Didn't used to have to register at WaPost. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:30:25 PM 7 Views
I guess the real test for those who would support the law aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:29:39 PM 20 Views
Good point. Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:32:33 PM 24 Views
Lots of stuff, Avi aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:40:12 PM 23 Views
I would argue... Aviendha - 28/04/2004 04:05:41 PM 15 Views
Re: Lots of stuff, Avi Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:05:45 PM 12 Views
Yes, I know. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 04:32:13 PM 15 Views
Re: Yes, I know. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:40:58 PM 12 Views
Aviendha - 28/04/2004 05:13:13 PM 17 Views
I don't read your replies. Ever. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:16:08 PM 3 Views
*blink* *NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 06:16:50 PM 4 Views
I didn't see that. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:34:12 PM 2 Views
Re: Good point. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:42:21 PM 11 Views
Well the article says... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:33:02 PM 12 Views
That was my initial thought, too. *NM* Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:40:00 PM 2 Views
I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. The Logic Ninja - 28/04/2004 04:23:53 PM 21 Views
Don't/Can't all individuals do that? *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:25:14 PM 5 Views
Re: I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. Nitish - 29/04/2004 07:23:54 AM 10 Views
Very interesting and well said. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 10:02:44 AM 2 Views
Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... The Logic Ninja - 29/04/2004 02:52:56 PM 6 Views
The law of the land is determined by social values, Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 04:11:55 PM 8 Views
Re: Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... Nitish - 29/04/2004 11:40:48 PM 6 Views
This is wrong. chorabliss - 28/04/2004 06:55:29 PM 14 Views
I agree. *NM* Green Gaidin - 28/04/2004 11:30:23 PM 2 Views
Back to Messageboard Search My Favourite Threads

Formatting
Smiley Codes