Re: He's given the minimum to survive he can
Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 07:44:23 AM
With the first two, he couldn't avoid it if he still wanted to have a country to run, he only did it as a minimum to appease the west. I'll believe the last part when it happnes, promises like that are very easy to break.
I'm not sure about the Pan-Am bombers, that happened before the whole war controversy began, right? But yes, he is appeasing the West and I agree about doubts about his statements about improving human rights. However, I think isolating Libya has served its purpose and weren't these the main events that got Libya isolated in the first place?
To build on your point, should the West have pushed their luck and tried to get more concessions from Gaddafi, considering his erratic mentality?
Libya
- 29/04/2004 06:23:11 AM
97 Views
I found it amusing
- 29/04/2004 06:31:24 AM
19 Views
I missed that, sounds funny though
- 29/04/2004 06:35:05 AM
12 Views
well, from what I understand
- 29/04/2004 06:39:02 AM
13 Views
That does ring a bell, now you mention it
- 29/04/2004 06:47:58 AM
10 Views
I don't know
- 29/04/2004 06:50:21 AM
10 Views
True, I am probably being to cynical
- 29/04/2004 06:53:23 AM
8 Views
*NM*
also
- 29/04/2004 06:57:00 AM
10 Views
I'll bow to your superior knowledge on religion
- 29/04/2004 07:01:27 AM
5 Views
that could not be a good idea
- 29/04/2004 07:03:16 AM
6 Views
I'm intrigued, but I can live without knowing, so don't worry about it *NM*
- 29/04/2004 07:04:17 AM
3 Views
interesting
- 29/04/2004 06:33:41 AM
22 Views
I doubt he will, but I hope he does
- 29/04/2004 06:36:02 AM
14 Views
I don't like Gaddafi but...small amount?
- 29/04/2004 07:30:56 AM
9 Views
He's given the minimum to survive he can
- 29/04/2004 07:36:55 AM
11 Views
Re: He's given the minimum to survive he can
- 29/04/2004 07:44:23 AM
7 Views