Community Messageboard 3: Yes, I know. by aerocontrols

Yes, I know. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 04:32:13 PM

True, but the question was under Sharia law.

My point (subtle though it was) is that is the reply to your argument. In other words, a great response to those Muslims who don't want to live under Sharia law is that they therefore aren't Muslims.

"Well I'm in business, the business of kicking your a$$, and let me tell you...business is boomin'. I'm open for business, the business of givin' you the business...

Soylent Green is my kind of people.

Click to see my webcam!

View/create new replies

Sharia in Canada aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:51:39 PM 168 Views

Cute. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 02:57:02 PM 7 Views

That's a rather puzzling response. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:58:05 PM 5 Views

It's Snuggly legislation if I've ever seen it

*NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:01:34 PM 2 Views

I skimmed thorugh the article (reading it again now) but... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:07:01 PM 18 Views

I now am registered at... Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:27:09 PM 15 Views

Didn't used to have to register at WaPost. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:30:25 PM 7 Views

I guess the real test for those who would support the law aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:29:39 PM 20 Views

Good point. Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:32:33 PM 24 Views

Lots of stuff, Avi aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:40:12 PM 23 Views

I would argue... Aviendha - 28/04/2004 04:05:41 PM 15 Views

Re: Lots of stuff, Avi Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:05:45 PM 12 Views

Yes, I know. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 04:32:13 PM 15 Views

Re: Yes, I know. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:40:58 PM 12 Views

Aviendha - 28/04/2004 05:13:13 PM 17 Views

I don't read your replies. Ever. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:16:08 PM 3 Views

*blink* *NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 06:16:50 PM 4 Views

I didn't see that. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:34:12 PM 2 Views

Re: Good point. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:42:21 PM 11 Views

Well the article says... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:33:02 PM 12 Views

That was my initial thought, too. *NM* Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:40:00 PM 2 Views

I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. The Logic Ninja - 28/04/2004 04:23:53 PM 21 Views

Don't/Can't all individuals do that? *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:25:14 PM 5 Views

Re: I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. Nitish - 29/04/2004 07:23:54 AM 10 Views

Very interesting and well said. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 10:02:44 AM 2 Views

Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... The Logic Ninja - 29/04/2004 02:52:56 PM 6 Views

The law of the land is determined by social values, Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 04:11:55 PM 8 Views

Re: Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... Nitish - 29/04/2004 11:40:48 PM 6 Views

This is wrong. chorabliss - 28/04/2004 06:55:29 PM 14 Views

I agree. *NM* Green Gaidin - 28/04/2004 11:30:23 PM 2 Views

Back to Messageboard

My Favourite Threads