Community Messageboard 3: I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. by The Logic Ninja

I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. The Logic Ninja - 28/04/2004 04:23:53 PM

Is whether they would continue to support it if some Christian fundies wanted to have separate courts based on Biblical law.

And I can make my own religion, and judge myself in my own religious court, right?

No.

I am not yet born, console me.
I fear that the human race may with tall walls wall me,
with strong drugs dope me, with wise lies lure me,
on black racks rack me, in blood-baths roll me.

View/create new replies

Sharia in Canada aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:51:39 PM 168 Views

Cute. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 02:57:02 PM 7 Views

That's a rather puzzling response. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 02:58:05 PM 5 Views

It's Snuggly legislation if I've ever seen it

*NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:01:34 PM 2 Views

I skimmed thorugh the article (reading it again now) but... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:07:01 PM 18 Views

I now am registered at... Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:27:09 PM 15 Views

Didn't used to have to register at WaPost. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:30:25 PM 7 Views

I guess the real test for those who would support the law aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:29:39 PM 20 Views

Good point. Aviendha - 28/04/2004 03:32:33 PM 24 Views

Lots of stuff, Avi aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 03:40:12 PM 23 Views

I would argue... Aviendha - 28/04/2004 04:05:41 PM 15 Views

Re: Lots of stuff, Avi Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:05:45 PM 12 Views

Yes, I know. aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 04:32:13 PM 15 Views

Re: Yes, I know. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:40:58 PM 12 Views

Aviendha - 28/04/2004 05:13:13 PM 17 Views

I don't read your replies. Ever. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:16:08 PM 3 Views

*blink* *NM* Aviendha - 28/04/2004 06:16:50 PM 4 Views

I didn't see that. *NM* aerocontrols - 28/04/2004 06:34:12 PM 2 Views

Re: Good point. Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:42:21 PM 11 Views

Well the article says... Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 03:33:02 PM 12 Views

That was my initial thought, too. *NM* Larisa - 28/04/2004 03:40:00 PM 2 Views

I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. The Logic Ninja - 28/04/2004 04:23:53 PM 21 Views

Don't/Can't all individuals do that? *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 28/04/2004 04:25:14 PM 5 Views

Re: I don't support either. The law of the land is the law of the land. Nitish - 29/04/2004 07:23:54 AM 10 Views

Very interesting and well said. *NM* Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 10:02:44 AM 2 Views

Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... The Logic Ninja - 29/04/2004 02:52:56 PM 6 Views

The law of the land is determined by social values, Monotonous Mantra - 29/04/2004 04:11:55 PM 8 Views

Re: Sweet. So, I'll make a religion with no punishment for theft... Nitish - 29/04/2004 11:40:48 PM 6 Views

This is wrong. chorabliss - 28/04/2004 06:55:29 PM 14 Views

I agree. *NM* Green Gaidin - 28/04/2004 11:30:23 PM 2 Views

Back to Messageboard

My Favourite Threads