I'll put this up for you again, your words. '. I was just Saying that WW made fair points and i thought chora was being a unfair on him, i never said anything about the MAY thing?' Again I will state, chora never replied to WW until WW insulted him. I saw the insults, I can't believe you didn't.Don't point out bad behaviour to justify worse behaviour mister wads, that is intellectually false.
there was the implication there. It seemed that I was stupid for defending chora and WW was being reasoned. Apparently if I attacked WW for his comments, his comments to chora were all ok.no read other posts i cant be bothered typing it out again.
aha. So any insults by WW were all ok?Any insults by WW would not be ok no.
not yet. Again, I really don't bother that often. How many people do?Not sure not many i would think.
they were obvious insults and I saw them right away. I'm pretty sure I've already detailed his insults against chora and in no way were they concealed. let's see fanatical sceptic, pulling statements out of his backside etc.well chora is pretty fanatic of his skeptesism towards any organised religion.and pulling statements i would see as more of descrptive sentence.
I've already shown it. It's also funny how you now say it was nothing against chora but instead of saying this from the very first or even after my first reply to you you now claim it. NOW? yeah, right.I was answering your questions directly,as your questions changed so did my answers.
Listen i cant be bothered with this that much if you feel so strongly about it i willl continue, but i will give you last word.
"Sorry. Can't stand reflexive used as a subject."
Funniest thing me and my mates have ever heard/seen.
No one would set up a firing squad just to give people a job