and the little put down about countryman being on yank land. You took his side on the issue and you called it reasoned. To me reasoned is not launching into a diatribe against someone. You also apparently didn't understand chora's arguments which were not in any way unreasoned. You associate yourself with WW. You also then say I am being stupid by defending chora. My whole post was about hte word MAY that chora had used. If my post was so stupid then you were basically saying that the word MAY was innapropriate and should not have been used. That is not just what I alone got out of that post. If you did not mean that then too bad that is the definite impression that people got. And of course you wouldn't apologise for htat.Ok the yank land was a joke, you being very anti-american and still standing up for your buddy.Personally now that i look at it closer i think chora just got a taste of his own medicine.I wouldn't really say im associating myself with WW, everyone we agree with we are now associating with?OK you using swearing and jumping in was stupid THATS what i meant, if you took it another way, i do apologise(seriously) and i would have even if you hadn't called me on it at the end there.

on another note, I wasn't trying to flame anyone here. I'll restate that again for your benefit.Cheers.

which post? The one where you called me stupid? I mis interpreted that did I? You thought it was wrong but coming from WW it was reasoned? Unbelievable! This whole diatribe of yours here is unbelievable. writing a serious post and 45 mins later writing a drrunk one? When was this? More htan likely I was drunk when I wrote the first one, but if I really put in the effort, if I put it through a spell check then it can come out halfway decent. My memory of whatever I have typed the next day is more than a bit hazy.No No the post ages ago, it doesn't matter now.It was yesterday you said about the sweat stains, then typed one about burping pasta.again it doesn't matter.

your grudges? I do have a few friends on msn and I pointed it out to one. There was snoopster, chora, myself and someone else yes.Fair enough, in future i would suggest your time could be spent better discussing something else.As im sure you will agree i'm not really worth that much discussion over 3 maybe even 4 continents.I didn't realise you guys were so paranoid.

as I already said, with your post you left yourself open to others believing that you were having a go at chora as well. You felt free to jump in against me there and yet WW doing it is perfectly reasoned. I've already explained this.When did WW jump in agaisnt you?Before you jumped in agaisnt him.i will apologise for any misunderstanding in my post again.

you really are letting your dislike of me and chora get in the way here. The whole diatribe in this post only proves my point. Hardly, chora as i have said before doesn't bother me, his miow factor is amusing.

oh and your words here......... 'I was just Saying that WW made fair points and i thought chora was being a unfair on him, i never said anything about the MAY thing?' How was chora being unfair on him when he went and attacked chora for his reply to snoopster?The incidents where chora used his less eloquent side to call him a spent condom etc.


"Sorry. Can't stand reflexive used as a subject."

Funniest thing me and my mates have ever heard/seen.

No one would set up a firing squad just to give people a job