you're still on about that? If you hold no grudge though then why jump in against chora when basically it was WW who started it all? Chora wasn't even referring to him. You make no mention that perhaps WW was being a bit harsh, no, you just went on against chora. You have a go at me and call me stupid and imply that isn't a surprise. Now this to me smacks of holding a grudge and clearly snoopster and others believe so. Your actions give the lie to your words.I never jumped in agaisn't chora, when did i do that?You show me where please.When did i go on agaisnt chora, i said the argument that WW was putting on for jesus existing was reasoned and made a few good points.I thought you were wrong to just wish he was aborted etc. Plus after your ribbing about how pitiful my "flames" were, i was expressing my disapointment at yours.

Now as for "going on" about the issue, this is the first time i mentioned it, I don't like you for reasons i stated You mis interpeted my post and decided to lay into me how nice,although i have probably done the same before.Also although it doesn't really bother me as in disliking you but it does leave me puzzled, how you can write a decent post then 45 mins later you write a big drunken one?This is from someone who was once accused of pretending to be drunk(but i was drunk at the time).As for thinking your stupid and that insn't a surprise well i dont think it is for me.You jumped in with both feet cursing and swearing calling people names.I thought that was wrong.To be fair the majority of your serious posts i don't find stupid, but the brother at arms ones, when you disagree with someone normally are.That is why it was no surprise to me.

Snoopster can belive what he wants and he doesn't need me to tell him that.As for others are you including chora?Or others??I have seen no other posts saying this, or are you having clandestine NB discussions about my "grudges" or maybe in chat? I doubt it.

yet you feel free to basically turn this into a bit of a put down.The guy overeacts about most religious posts etc.I find it funny, how he reacts is a testament to him not me.

what I would like you to do is to go back to WW's reply to chora and reread it. Tell me if you think it was totally fair and wasn't at all inflammatory.the put downs weren't really the subject of my post, i wish you would understand that i never replied to chora as you all seem to think, i thought that he was being reasoned about christ existing, and holding his own. He may have been a bit patronising but he backed it up with a description of their actions(logic ninja as well) as opposed to saying "you are a spent condom" or you are "moronic" or some other palyground insult.


"Sorry. Can't stand reflexive used as a subject."

Funniest thing me and my mates have ever heard/seen.

No one would set up a firing squad just to give people a job