Active Users:1035 Time:21/11/2024 07:36:07 PM
not necessarily. `Shade - 24/01/2003 08:43:00 AM

that's like saying that one has to be part of a minority group in order to support the rights of people in that group. these women aren't asking for personal damages.

then again, i can't see that anyone could have the legal standing to support this kind of suit. as mierin put it, 'it's silly.'


Valopicurhak foc gecer bädëtti ve vöza pëvakommik tige lopicevö lopiccix.




View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Texas suit targets 100 companies tied to slave trade - 24/01/2003 07:32:28 AM 262 Views
does not click! - 24/01/2003 07:35:30 AM 34 Views
good lord - 24/01/2003 12:15:04 PM 27 Views
i will not, you are incorrect - 24/01/2003 07:46:02 PM 19 Views
... - 24/01/2003 08:06:37 PM 19 Views
you dont know me and i dont know you - 24/01/2003 08:48:06 PM 23 Views
Exactly - 24/01/2003 09:03:53 PM 13 Views
sure why not - 24/01/2003 09:18:12 PM 13 Views
interesting.... - 24/01/2003 07:37:23 AM 38 Views
i'm not sure if they acted within the law - 24/01/2003 07:39:35 AM 26 Views
Well for one thing, these aren't actual slaves. - 24/01/2003 07:54:45 AM 24 Views
*nods* excellent points *NM* - 24/01/2003 08:01:33 AM 4 Views
The Nazi's were breaking international law and committing war crimes - 24/01/2003 08:21:04 AM 22 Views
time is the issue - 24/01/2003 08:26:26 AM 22 Views
Not really - 24/01/2003 08:48:28 AM 25 Views
I respectfully disagree *NM* - 24/01/2003 06:15:16 PM 4 Views
Feel free - 26/01/2003 02:28:37 AM 7 Views
meh - 26/01/2003 09:45:42 PM 5 Views
The gap in time is a secondary issue - 24/01/2003 09:44:28 AM 11 Views
silly - 24/01/2003 08:17:16 AM 25 Views
why is this necessary? - 24/01/2003 08:19:00 AM 22 Views
well, 'cause i assume a couple of white guys.... - 24/01/2003 08:21:05 AM 21 Views
not necessarily. - 24/01/2003 08:43:00 AM 15 Views
well, i do agree with you in that.... - 24/01/2003 05:30:11 PM 7 Views
i am most disagreeable. - 24/01/2003 05:42:25 PM 6 Views
Any bets on whether the Honorable Gary Bledsoe... - 24/01/2003 08:51:23 AM 23 Views
no doubt he's working pro bono...it's all about healing, after all *NM* - 24/01/2003 11:39:49 AM 10 Views
Those laywers - such idealists the lot of 'em. *NM* - 24/01/2003 12:19:57 PM 7 Views
LOL - 24/01/2003 05:31:26 PM 10 Views
I have one question... - 24/01/2003 10:07:36 AM 24 Views
*shrugs™* - 24/01/2003 05:33:14 PM 8 Views
I agree with you, Lit-Dog. - 24/01/2003 11:14:26 AM 18 Views
Re: Texas suit targets 100 companies tied to slave trade - 24/01/2003 11:23:34 AM 13 Views
Theres a reason that there is a staute of Limitations. *NM* - 24/01/2003 12:06:58 PM 7 Views
Think - 24/01/2003 12:37:06 PM 29 Views
While I don't doubt for a minute that you subscribe to the... - 24/01/2003 01:03:06 PM 21 Views
Tis true - 24/01/2003 01:30:35 PM 15 Views
If they were smart... - 24/01/2003 01:45:49 PM 12 Views
Ahem - read more carefully.... - 24/01/2003 01:50:38 PM 16 Views
My understanding though... - 24/01/2003 01:54:57 PM 11 Views
Well.... - 24/01/2003 02:00:55 PM 11 Views
Hmmm..... - 24/01/2003 01:07:12 PM 18 Views
a few minor points. - 24/01/2003 01:28:54 PM 14 Views
The South is far from the only bed of Racism. - 24/01/2003 01:49:36 PM 10 Views
which explains - 24/01/2003 01:51:57 PM 10 Views
It also might explain... - 24/01/2003 01:56:12 PM 13 Views
i am jack's complete lack of surprise. - 24/01/2003 01:58:43 PM 10 Views
don't worry darlin', i do think - 24/01/2003 06:41:59 PM 10 Views
Oi vay - 24/01/2003 08:12:31 PM 8 Views
so if i don't agree with you.... - 24/01/2003 08:28:29 PM 8 Views
You must agree with me.... - 24/01/2003 08:49:32 PM 13 Views
hehehe, another topic it is! - 25/01/2003 07:24:16 PM 6 Views
I just don't see why they'd try, they can't possibly win. *NM* - 24/01/2003 02:05:50 PM 4 Views
Things like this - 24/01/2003 05:46:46 PM 17 Views
I agree with you darlin' - 24/01/2003 05:53:47 PM 10 Views