anyone can also see that any disarmament is unwilling when a gun is being held to their head. Try.
OK, good point. Call it unwilling if you want. The three examples she gave were nations who were better sports about having to back down then. The point is, they showed real cooperation. By contrast, Iraq has not. Even UN inspector Blix has stated that.
I forgot to mention what a lovely article it was. Iraq is guilty no matter what the UN finds and says. She offers no proof, just supposition.
No, as I stated, she contrasts Iraq with the other three nations mentioned and wondered, as I do, why this comparison escapes so many people. It is not supposition at all to state that Iraq has sought to evade complying. That is also the position of the UN inspection team.
Whatever my private supsicions are.......I'll wait for the UN report and see what action the UN recommends. Just because Condoleeza Rice wants war, doesn't mean that it's right.
War? Or regime change?
On another point......I don't know why I bother, we keep running around in circles with these arguments.
It's an experiment to see if one Wotmania liberal will ever concede that an opposing point has even slight merit. I feel like Diogenes.... 
Da Mook
"You're not cute, you're a silver-fox sex god is what you are." LiterateDog to me, of course
"snoop elsewhere" -Pevara
