Active Users:1316 Time:25/12/2024 07:04:42 AM
Re: ok... Tredogg - 23/01/2003 11:47:50 AM

Right. Some people say 'don't condemn him...' when they mean 'he shouldn't be condemned...' I took your words to be directed at me, rather than at anyone.

Yes, indeed. In fact, there is no law or rule against discrimination in political appointments. If he was applying for a job opening in the government, that would be a different story.

His appointment will cause trouble for the Bush administration, no matter how wonderfully or horribly he performs. Thus, I believe, appointing him is an idiotic political decision, and I hope it is reversed.
I think you are right on this point. I dont think it will be reversed though, to many other things in politics for bush to care about this guy, he has to worry about Sadam.
aerocontrols


View/create new replies Sign up for a premium account to add posts to a list of favourites!
Ugh... (edit with good news) - 23/01/2003 10:12:45 AM 268 Views
I saw that article in the morning paper... - 23/01/2003 10:39:19 AM 27 Views
His appointment does seem to be very badly wrong *NM* - 23/01/2003 10:49:11 AM 5 Views
Whats the big deal?? - 23/01/2003 11:00:08 AM 37 Views
but it didnt begin in gay men - 23/01/2003 11:02:44 AM 33 Views
No - 23/01/2003 11:06:09 AM 23 Views
true - 23/01/2003 11:09:11 AM 19 Views
Im not sure. - 23/01/2003 11:16:04 AM 21 Views
more aids sufferers in the world are now women - 23/01/2003 11:17:44 AM 16 Views
Not hearsay - 23/01/2003 11:20:35 AM 19 Views
Yeah... - 23/01/2003 12:21:56 PM 15 Views
I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:23:29 AM 21 Views
Re: I didn't condemn him - 23/01/2003 11:26:17 AM 14 Views
ok... - 23/01/2003 11:35:50 AM 14 Views
Re: ok... - 23/01/2003 11:47:50 AM 10 Views
I'd guess it's because he appears closed minded and will... - 23/01/2003 11:37:55 AM 13 Views
Sorry, posted in wrong place *NM* - 23/01/2003 02:34:36 PM 7 Views
sigh - 23/01/2003 11:00:39 AM 21 Views
They claim... - 23/01/2003 11:04:04 AM 23 Views
dimwitted? - 23/01/2003 11:24:19 AM 21 Views
Merely in his stances on... - 23/01/2003 11:32:49 AM 18 Views
then - 23/01/2003 11:36:44 AM 15 Views
Once again... - 23/01/2003 11:46:21 AM 13 Views
I disagree. - 23/01/2003 11:39:45 AM 17 Views
*sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:49:46 AM 18 Views
Re: *sighs* - 23/01/2003 11:52:53 AM 14 Views
Gladly... - 23/01/2003 12:15:52 PM 15 Views
sigh *NM* - 23/01/2003 12:02:01 PM 4 Views
This is wrong in so many ways - 23/01/2003 12:22:12 PM 17 Views
Geeze, people - 23/01/2003 02:35:32 PM 22 Views
As long as we're clear - 23/01/2003 02:57:17 PM 19 Views
We're clear - 24/01/2003 11:54:47 AM 6 Views
Urm... - 23/01/2003 03:02:16 PM 18 Views
Re: Urm... - 24/01/2003 01:25:24 PM 10 Views
true 'nuff. - 24/01/2003 01:51:12 PM 8 Views
Come on... - 24/01/2003 02:29:10 PM 7 Views
excellent, i am pleased he withdrew. *NM* - 23/01/2003 03:55:22 PM 2 Views
Things like this anger me.. - 26/01/2003 07:03:21 AM 8 Views
I think he knows - 26/01/2003 10:28:38 AM 6 Views