and statements in reference to homosexuality and the nature of AIDS. That and making it very public only to try removing evidence of his exact opionions once they came under national scrutiny.

My comments are not intended to make judgements on any other aspect of the man's life, decisions or stances because I both do not have any real knowledge of them, nor am I in a position to make that statement.

His statements about homosexuality and HIV I equate to a similar level to those who deny the holocaust. I know those are very different things, but people are welcome to disagree with me.

How so. This ought to be good so make it well thought out so I can reply.