False. Easily checkable. Google "election" and "court case"

The judicial branch's job is to determine the consitutionality of law, even election law. Such court cases happen after every election. Here's one:

http://touchngo.com/sp/html/sp-4264.htm

Gore didn't ask to recount every vote. He cherry-picked counties to recount in. Gore would have lost if he had recieved the recount he petitioned the court for.

False again. You aren't very good at this are you?

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/media/media_watch/jan-june01/recount_4-3.html

In the first full study of Florida's ballots since the election ended, The Miami Herald and USA Today reported George W. Bush would have widened his 537-vote victory to a 1,665-vote margin if the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court would have been allowed to continue, using standards that would have allowed even faintly dimpled "undervotes" -- ballots the voter has noticeably indented but had not punched all the way through -- to be counted.

In other words, if Gore received the recount he asked for, he still would have lost. Said yet another way: If the Supreme Court would have found for Gore rather than Bush, Bush still would have won the disputed recount.

Getting the facts is always a good start.

aerocontrols


Queen of her own castle and ruler of none
Shameless member of the Babefest '90